User talk:Mymazdatribute

Drive train type	Dry road	On road light snow and rain with dry spots	Deep Snow	Off road capable
Front Wheel Drive	Yes	Yes	Not well	No
AWD	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Part-time 4WD	Only in RWD mode	Only in RWD mode	Yes	Yes
Full-time 4WD	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes

Note!: For this table: AWD has no low range, Part-Time 4wd has no center diff, Full-time 4wd has a center diff.

Vehicle Name	Ground Clearance (in)	Aproach Angle	Departure Angle	Break Over Angle
H1	16	72	37.5	29
H2	10.8	42.8°	40°	27.5°
H3	9.1	39.4°	36.5°	25.0°
Wrangler Rubicon	10.2	44.3°	40.4°	25.3°
Wrangler Rubicon UL	10.1	44.4°	40.5°	20.8°
Jeep Liberty	9.4	37.2°	31.5°	21.8°
Grand Cherokee	8.3	34.1°	27°	20°
Jeep Commander	8.5	34.6°	27.2°	21.2°
Nissan Xterra	9.5	33.2°	29.4°	24.6°
Nissan Pathfinder	9.2	32.6°	24°	22.3°
Toyota FJ Cruiser	9.6	34°	30°	27.4°
Range Rover	11.0	34°	26.6°	30°
Land Rover LR3	9.5	37.2°	29.6°	27.9°
VW Touareg	6.3 to 11.8	33°	33° no typo	27°
GL class	7.9 to 10.9	33°	27°	°
Ford Expedition EL	8.7	24.1°	20.9°	18.7°
Subaru Outback 2.5xt	8.7	19°	23°	21°

Safety Nazi

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Safety Nazi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Safety Nazi. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Before deciding to remove the template, however, please try to cite one or more reliable sources for the term. Thanks. Regards, Accurizer 14:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for updating the link. My concern, as noted above, was that the information was not verifiable using a reliable source. Accurizer 18:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for following up. My concern is not with the use of 'Nazi', but with the verifiability and notability of the term. --mikm 18:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Lowest 0 to 60 acceleration for a given price for vehicles sold in the USA.

An editor has nominated the article Lowest 0 to 60 acceleration for a given price for vehicles sold in the USA. for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lowest 0 to 60 acceleration for a given price for vehicles sold in the USA.. Add four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Lowest 0 to 60 acceleration for a given price for vehicles sold in the USA. during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of GMPCA

An editor has nominated GMPCA, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GMPCA and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of guard dog breeds

The article List of guard dog breeds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced list, tagged since March 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pointillist (talk) 21:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dogo Guatemalteco

The article Dogo Guatemalteco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources available, passing mentions here and here but nowhere else.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TKK ^{bark !} 13:59, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Ahhaahha.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:37, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)