User talk:Nanev1976

May 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Fakescientist8000. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 22:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a propaganda/advertisement site, or fact/science one? Nanev1976 (talk) 07:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neither. It's an encyclopedia. BilCat (talk) 08:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Definition of "encyclopedia" from Wikipedia:

Generally speaking, encyclopedia articles focus on factual information concerning the subject Nanev1976 (talk) 09:44, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content dispute[edit]

You have now twice removed well-established cited content from FGM-148 Javelin. Please discuss this at Talk:FGM-148 Javelin, or your removal of the content is likely to be reverted again. — The Anome (talk) 22:52, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to FGM-148 Javelin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 07:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That content has wp:reliable sources. Adakiko (talk) 07:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on FGM-148 Javelin. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 07:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]