User talk:Nashassum

Page moving[edit]

What the hell are you doing? J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 03:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting falsehoods, POV and original research.

Michael Jackson[edit]

Use the talk page for potentially controversial edits. Pyrrhus16 16:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Michael Jackson. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dr.K. logos 02:36, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Omer Bhatti ‎[edit]

Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humor. Best wishes.

your message was removed because it seemed either ignorant or racist. either way it is an inappropriate comment. --emerson7 03:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- I couldn't care less if you think my comment is "ignorant". Do not remove comments from talk pages, that is considered vandalism. Nashassum (talk) 05:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

- - If Omer Bhatti is so un-noteable, then why have you been commenting on him? It seems to me that deletion for non-noteability should be reserved for people no one ever heard of. People have heard of Omer Bhatti. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Only in connection with his relationship with Michael Jackson. He's not notable per se. People only known in connection with their relationship with a famous person are not notable. Nashassum (talk) 17:44, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

just so that you know, the term 'negro' can be considered a perjorative, and i didn't bother with removing it since i was sure the entire article would soon be deleted. in future, you should be careful to not use such offensive terms in your writings. --emerson7 21:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Michael Jackson[edit]

Your edits there have been reverted. You need to discuss your proposed changes at the talkpage, as multiple editors find them controversial. Unit Anode 15:07, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Nashassum. You have new messages at MrStalker's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MrStalker ^(talk) 18:16, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]