User talk:Nbaka is a joke

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please email WP:BASC if you wish to appeal this block in the future. 23:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Nbaka is a joke! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Akerans (talk) 16:03, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your editing history[edit]

A look at your editing history here is troubling. You have almost exclusively edited talk pages rather than contributing to articles, and I have deleted two of your contributions for being libelous. Your personal opinion of a particular television host are not appropriate, even on the talk page of an article. A talk pages is not a forum for discussing a person but rather a place to develop consensus on what should go in an article. By libeling a particular person, claiming what they said on TV is not worthy of inclusion, you are showing the community that your own bias is affecting your opinion, and that you appear to be pushing a particular point of view.

I have no opinion on the individual who you accused of lying - I actually have never heard of the person - so I am not saying that your claim is true or not, because I really don't know. What I am saying is that it does not matter, because it is not allowed around here. Looking at your other edits, I see a tendency toward very strong opinions, bordering on combative; please be aware that continuing in this fashion may get you blocked.

If you have any questions, please let me know.  Frank  |  talk  19:22, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Well I was told not do a major edit without discussion on the talk pages. Please do not remove my edits without discussion.Nbaka is a joke (talk) 19:38, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed your recent contributions, and I agree that you appear to hold very strong political opinions, and to be mainly interested in adding those political opinions to Wikipedia. We'll know you're really interested, not jut in promoting your own opinions, but in making the encyclopedia better, if we see you making more helpful edits to subjects that aren't related to American politics (like music, sport, food, or geography, for example), and fewer that are related to your own strong opinions. If your main interest is publishing your political ideas, you're probably not going to enjoy participating at Wikipedia, and should consider starting a blog, where you can write your ideas without the limitation of neutrality. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:55, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


October 2010[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your username is clearly intended to mock the 1948 Palestinian exodus. That is not acceptable. (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:40, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nbaka is a joke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been using this name for over a month with no complaint. I ttied several other names that were taken. Now this administator has a PC motive. As there was no 1948 Exodus and the Nbaka is a myth as there was no seprate Plaestinains state. A wiki administatator is not permitted to block because of a disagreement with an editor.

Decline reason:

{{subst:Decline Your request makes it yet more obvious that your username has a political message. If you want to say that this or that is a joke or a myth, then do so on some other website, perhaps your own.}} Hoary (talk) 02:14, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nbaka is a joke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i checkthe rules there is nothing that says I can't use this name. Block was done for political reasons.

Decline reason:

Nope. Block was done for apolitical reasons. --jpgordon::==( o ) 03:46, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm sorry you had trouble finding an appropriate username. I used my own imagination, and found some usernames that are still available: User:Desert Clothesline, User:Blue Llama, and User:IHeartJazz are all available. But I wouldn't support an unblock, even for a name change, unless you could give some assurance that you had a plan for editing without pushing your own political opinions. The block is related to 'political reasons' only in the sense that no one, no matter what their politics, is allowed to edit to promote their political opinions. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 03:33, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the record I do not know the details of the incident being referenced and have no opinion as to this users assertion that those events did not happen. That is not relevant to the issue of whether this is a needlessly inflammatory user name intended to mock and/or attack a specific group of people. If your username was "The Armenian genocide is a joke" or something like that I'm sure you would have been blocked much sooner, it just took a while for an observant user to notice your name and report it at WP:UAA. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:41, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The administrators who have blocked me must also work at NPR, which is the only reason for blocking, I checked the rules there was no valid reason for blocking. you could have suggested a name change. Since Admins are not respecting the rules, I will not respect their decision and circumvent the block.Nbaka is a joke (talk) 08:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean when you say that you 'checked the rules.' and that they permit you to use a username that may be offensive to other users. I think you may have missed WP:USERNAME, which is the relevant rule here, and the section on 'offensive usernames.' I suggest that you don't continue pushing your political opinions with your block-avoiding new account; you'll be much less likely to be caught and blocked again if you're making useful edits. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 10:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Username section says that if an editor has a problem with another user name the first step is to contact that user. No one did. I find nothing offensive about (yes it is a political statment on a myth progandized) but is not grounds for banning. I can only assume that I am being banned as many Jewish posters who date to post facts about islamic terrorist groups on Wikipedia. I suggest you all look in the mirror about your own political views and prejudices and stop bowing to the islamic pressure that seems to dominate on Wikipedia.

The Nbaka is a joke!

I'm sorry that you feel you didn't have enough information about the rules and their consequences. I want, therefore, to tell you clearly that your access to this talk page can be disabled by any administrator. You have access to this talk page so that you can use it to request a different username, and to assure us that your future contributions will not be for the purpose of adding your political opinions to articles. However, if you continue to use your talk page to make personal attacks, it is quite likely that your ability to edit this talk page will be disabled, since a blocked user who does not wish to edit Wikipedia appropriately has no need for an active talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:50, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then you are accepting my point that I should have not been blocked. With the exception of couple of posts everything was put on talk pages. So there was no harm done to Wikipedia. I maintain that I am being blocked as there is pro Palestinian slant by a segment of the wiki community, as far as where I post that does superceed an admins authority and I believe you know it.

I propose the following alternate names

Basil Rock yeska randonNbaka is a joke (talk) 12:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this comment to the end of the talk page; in the middle, it is not likely to be seen or read. No further action on my part is needed at this time. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:08, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You may edit as any one of "Basil Rock", "Yeska", or "Randon", if this has not already been taken (I haven't checked). This is on the understanding that (i) the one you choose has no unsuitable meaning in any language that you happen to know and I don't, and (ii) you're here to construct an encyclopedia, and not to further a political, ethnic or ideological position. Choose one name, and announce here which one it is. Whichever name you choose, you should assume that its edits will be examined. -- Hoary (talk) 12:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am still being blocked, please remove the block by Beeblebrox

IFF you declare an intention to help construct an encyclopedia and not to further a political, ethnic or ideological position, then I'll let your IP number(s) make edits. Then you say here which new username you have. If all looks good, the IP number(s) will remain unblocked.
However, I must leave the internet for a few hours starting in a few minutes. -- Hoary (talk) 14:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That has been what I have been doing trying to help construct, not to further agenda. I have not vandalize so I will switch to Basil Rock.Basil Rock 15:33, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

You seem to be saying that you think your previous edits did not focus on your political opinions, and, if unblocked, you would continue editing in the same way as you did before. Is that correct? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What I was saying that my edits that were not on talk page were designed to improve Wikipedia. the talk pages are designed to debate or discuss changes, I can say in all honesty my points there were back by facts as opposed to a political agenda. If yu disagree than every one on the talk pages is on the same boat.So please unblock as you agreed.Basil Rock 00:33, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. Over the course of several days, you've consistently misunderstood what I and others object to in your editing. It seems that, if unblocked, you would be likely to continue pushing your own political opinions, and that you are either unwilling or unable to edit in any other way. I think there's nothing more I can do to help you, but I wish you happiness. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:43, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may object to it, but that was not why I was blocked. I was blocked because of a User name violation. I think if you polled people on the Fox News talk Blaxthos would be considered the one who put his political view up. I now ask you to honor your agreement and remove the block. Thank you.Basil Rock 01:09, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

You might want to read the block notice again. Specifically the part that says "users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated." Beeblebrox (talk) 04:41, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes you were indeed blocked because of a username violation. And yes, constructive argument over an article (and not the subject of that article) is usually permitted in the talk page of that article. So I have some sympathy with your position. Now tell me/us: If, as Basil Rock, you want to contribute to Wikipedia, how would you like to contribute in your first 48 hours or so? (Which article(s), and roughly what would you want to add?) -- Hoary (talk) 04:50, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nbaka_is_a_joke&oldid=1063825361"