User talk:Nichts0176

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Nichts0176, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Wu Chinese have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Zanhe (talk) 08:46, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss at Talk:Wu Chinese#"Uesian" instead of continuing to try to force your new term into the article. Kanguole 14:22, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

Your recent editing history at Wu Chinese shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -Zanhe (talk) 23:37, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

pls notice, edit war is not initiated by me, but by another one who shows no respect to other people's work. My editting disturbs or changes nothing of anyone, but add a humble altertive of a translated name, which I think is equal to what exits. But someone has phobia or hatry against what they dont know.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Nichts0176 reported by User:Zanhe (Result: ). Thank you. Zanhe (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Wu Chinese. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:31, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 96 hours for edit warring, as you did at Wu Chinese. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Immediately reverting again after your block expired was not the best decision. All that's going to do is lead to longer blocks. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: The user again immediately reverted Kanguole after the second block expired. -Zanhe (talk) 15:28, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:26, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]