User talk:Nicoli102

May 2019[edit]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DannyS712 (talk) 22:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. You may edit my article, Viyce, as much as you wish to suit your own preferred levels of neutrality. Nicoli102 (talk) 01:51, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viyce (May 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DannyS712 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Viyce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Viyce, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DannyS712 (talk) 02:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nicoli102! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DannyS712 (talk) 02:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Viyce[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Viyce, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 03:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Abusing multiple accounts.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

User:Fraction7. EdJohnston (talk) 04:00, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See also WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Fraction7. EdJohnston (talk) 11:46, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Viyce[edit]

Hello, Nicoli102,

Please be aware that the administrators on Wikipedia are aware of the many times you have tried to get an article written about your home movie on YouTube. If Wikipedia had an article about everyone's personal videos on YouTube, it would have a billion articles instead of 6 million. We have standards of notability and your home movie has none. If you ever get sustained coverage of your film in RELIABLE SOURCES (newspapers, media blogs, books, etc.), we can consider maybe composing a draft. But right now, it is just your personal video and it is not eligible for a Wikipedia article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]