User talk:Nikos697276

Niko ftiakse to lima me to superkipello elladas opos eine stin elliniki vikipedia.

Thanks you.--77.49.38.169 (talk) 07:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

στην κολύμβηση;; Nikos697276 (talk) 19:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sto podosfairo.--62.1.166.124 (talk) 13:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Acroterion (talk) 23:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If violin was a bird, a lot of people would play it. You blocked me because I wrote right things. You reverted my right edits. I don't have another account! I don't use another account. This is how dictatorship works! I don't give a shit about all the lies. I'm happy to know the truth. You are sad to know it too. Because it is deep inside of you. Nikos697276 (talk) 14:59, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am Nikos697276! I am not Vrahomaninaner or a "sock puppey"! YOU are facists! And I like the fact that you feel pain through the truth which is placed deep inside of you. Nikos697276 (talk) 15:39, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nikos697276 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

For one thing, it is pretty clear that this account is a sockpuppet, and for another thing I don't think I have ever seen an account unblocked as a result of an unblock request which is accompanied by childish attacks on other edits, such as you have posted above. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It was a misunderstanding. I am not Vrahomarinaner. I just made some mistakes, learning the process here. I will be very helpful. Nikos697276 (talk) 19:42, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]