User talk:Nile Lover

June 2016[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nile Lover (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not sock puppet. I am an old user of wikipedia as you can see in the Arabic section of wikipedia Nile Lover (talk) 20:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You show up with a brand new account apparently for the sole purpose of getting another editor in trouble. It is clear you have another account here or how would you even know the person you are reporting. Getting another person in trouble is not a legitimate use of an alternate account. Before any unblock request is granted we need to start by knowing which account you normally use here. HighInBC 21:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, this was not the case. What happened is that someone I know was reading about M. Ali today then he went from there to the article about Sunni Islam and noticed the violation and told me about it then I came to see it then I reported it. That is all. Nile Lover (talk) 21:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nile Lover (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What happened is that someone I know was reading about M. Ali today then he went from there to the article about Sunni Islam and noticed the violation and told me about it then I came to see it then I reported it. That is all. Nile Lover (talk) 21:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 22:16, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.