User talk:No parking here

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Sju hav (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sju hav for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. meco (talk) 12:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A renewed investigation has been requested at the same location as above. __meco (talk) 13:22, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, No parking here. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! meco (talk) 17:50, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Members list on AUF article[edit]

Hey!

I've been reverting your edits recently of the list of members on the AUF article. This is not because I believe their history is not a part of AUF - saying so would be silly - but as the article stands, the content is not worked into the article in a good way. My humble suggestion is that if you wish this content to be a part of the article, you make it a part of the organizational history.

Regards, and keep on contributing, toresbe 16:11, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Workers%27_Youth_League_(Norway)&oldid=492499117#Members_list --No parking here (talk) 09:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"not suitable as a first paragraph"[edit]

Just as a little note, since I wont violate the 3RR rule, so what I in other cases would have written in an edit summary, I write here: Toresbe removed the paragraph and called it not suitable as a first paragraph, after you have changed the meaning from former leaders to former members. The paragraph you now removed have been in the article for some time, without Toresbe removing it. Mentoz86 (talk) 18:47, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Talk:Workers'_Youth_League_(Norway)#.22not_suitable_as_a_first_paragraph.22. --No parking here (talk) 19:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of bold in discussions[edit]

... is a bit vexing. Do you think you could use italics instead, like most people who, like you, have an exorbitant need to make emphasis? __meco (talk) 20:54, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sculpture park in Oslo[edit]

A sculpture park in Oslo has already started its construction Ekebergåsen.

http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/ostlandssendingen/1.8144166

http://www.aftenposten.no/kultur/Politiet-etterforsker-mulig-korrupsjon-i-Oslo-kommune-6831830.html

http://www.dn.no/forsiden/politikkSamfunn/article2400333.ece

Is there anything to discuss? --No parking here (talk) 13:21, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/oslo/-Gar-til-krig-mot-Christian-Ringnes-skulpturpark-6834368.html --No parking here (talk) 09:02, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/En-skitten-folkeaksjon-6836472.html --No parking here (talk) 12:19, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oslo Freedom Forum[edit]

Please stop reverting the changes and participate in the talk page discussion if you have something new to add. I may have to bring this up with the admins due to the multiple reverts with no explanation or discussion if it keeps up. Wrathofjames (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revert wars are not the way to resolve this issue. Wikipedia has plenty of conflict resolution tools available, various noticeboards among them. __meco (talk) 22:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Oslo_Freedom_Forum&action=edit&section=2 --No parking here (talk) 09:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oslo Freedom Forum Dispute Resolution Notice[edit]

Just shooting a notice that I asked for some help from dispute resolution.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Oslo Freedom Forum". Thank you. --Wrathofjames (talk) 17:35, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No Parking[edit]

Not sure about this sockpuppet stuff, tendentious editing or whatever. In any case Wikipedians should be friendly. Feel free to borrow some of my no parking signs at User:Smallbones#Stupid_parking_signs ! Smallbones (talk) 20:03, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am still waiting for the primrose path sign! I think we're not in Kansas anymore, Smallbones. Good show! --No parking here (talk) 09:07, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

No parking here (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe that the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead.
One might also be able to make a case for an indefinite ban being "cruel and unusual punishment", of some sort. Would an expiration date for this block be too much to ask for?

Decline reason:

You need to make your unblock request from your original account. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Review of block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

No parking here (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe that the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead.
I do not have the password anymore, for User:Sju Hav, so I can not log in to that account.<br.> It might be realistic that I can stop editing for about 3 weeks. Might a plea bargain knock down the punishment to about that timeframe? --No parking here (talk) 10:08, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See our standard offer for such cases. Max Semenik (talk) 11:04, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.