Northamerica1000 is on Wikipedia intermittently and irregularly. Sometimes I am around for a few days or so, and other times I may be away for a few days or weeks; it all varies.
I respectfully disagree with the closing statement, although I agree with the close. There was a consensus against deletion of the content. There was not a consensus to retain the content. In particular, the MFD participants did not review the content. The reason that this makes a difference is that I think that the editors reserve the right to review the content of any of the individual pages and nominate them for deletion. Would it be possible to change the closing statement to say that there was a consensus against deletion at this time, or that there was not a consensus to delete? We didn't agree that the content should be kept, but that the nomination was flawed. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
