User talk:NotableSTEM

March 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for an account shared by a group of people, as you did at User:NotableSTEM.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Orange Mike | Talk 20:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bryanne Peterson (March 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't see a case for WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Further, this reads like promotional material for the subject. Too many of these citations are independent of the subject. Citing the publication the subject writes for cannot be used to establish notability and shouldn't be used as a source, at all, except to flesh out details newspapers and magazines don't establish. Also, in spot checking not all of the text is fully supported by the source, like the nonsense claim about becoming a drill at E4 and doing the course twice. You need proof for that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bryanne Peterson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bryanne Peterson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 02:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NotableSTEM! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 02:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bryanne Peterson[edit]

Hello, NotableSTEM. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bryanne Peterson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]