User talk:Notoadultery

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Amy Grant has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bxanga\.com' (link(s): http://www.xanga.com/JandJinJapan/674685114/concerning-fallen-christian-celebrities-and-stars.html) .

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 22:46, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Please don't insert your personal opinion into articles. That's not an acceptable behavior on Wikipedia. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 22:56, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

What are you talking about, why are you protecting her with taking true statements out? Why are you editorializing about Chapman's later life, he is NOT the subject of this topic?

Core policies

Dear Notoadultery, please review Wikipedia's core policies, one of which is neutrality, as well as the policy on biographies of living persons. Your recent edit to Amy Grant does not adhere to these policies, as you seem to be injecting your personal feelings on her marriages into the article, and not simply stating facts, backed by reliable sources. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a soapbox for anyone's personal views. It is an encyclopedia, which simply states facts, which are cited to reliable, third-party sources. Biographies of living persons have even more stringent rules, and must be adhered to strictly, for legal reasons. Please review these thoroughly, as you have previously been notified about injecting your personal viewpoints into articles. Thank you, Ariel♥Gold 20:01, 25 December 2008 (UTC)