User talk:Nyuwagner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Institute for Civil Infrastructure Systems, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wagner.nyu.edu/centers/icis.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 17:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John Brademas Center for the Study of Congress, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.helleniccomserve.com/brademas.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 17:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wagner.nyu.edu/centers/rudin.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 17:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Taroaldo 17:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, an automated search bot has found potential copyvio issues within the text of the article. But more than that, articles must meet general criteria for inclusion. I have also posted the following info on the RCTPM article's talk page: An article's subject must be notable to be included. The Help page can serve as a starting point to find useful info on Wikipedia, and you can check out WP:NOT for more specific info. - Hope this helps. --- Taroaldo 18:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Institute for Civil Infrastructure Systems, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Taroaldo 18:15, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:WagnerLogo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WagnerLogo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:WagnerLogo.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:WagnerLogoName.jpg. The copy called Image:WagnerLogoName.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:59, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia. To answer your question left on my talk page, here's what I suggest: make sure that when you create the articles, they assert notability according to our standards, and include a couple of good references from reliable sources - that will help prevent them from speedy deletion. In fact, if you'd like to draft them in your user-space (if you click on this red link ----> User:Nyuwagner/sandbox it will create a blank page in your own user space that's a safe place to draft articles) and then let me know, I'd be happy to look at them and make any suggestions, or move them out into the main encyclopedia for you. Below this message, I'm also leaving a welcome template that will give you a lot of hints for how to start editing Wikipedia. Again, welcome! If you have any questions, you can always feel free to ask them on my talk page, or here - I'll watchlist your page so that I see them.

Welcome!

Hello, Nyuwagner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Speedy delete of NYU Capstone Program[edit]

A tag has been placed on NYU Capstone Program requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Noetic Sage 00:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

as it did not fit under the speedy criterion used, it has been changed, buy another admin, to PROD--see the tag on the article for instructions. I endorse that tag, for this is an unreferenced pressrelease about what is only a required internship in a single professional school academic program at NYU. No more notable than any other internship program--all professional programs have capstones, they are a routine matter. No evidence of notability. If you an show otherwise, remove the tag.If you remove the tag without showing otherwise, it will probably be carried forward to WP:AFD, for a community discussion on deletion. DGG (talk) 06:51, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


General advice[edit]

We welcome articles on notable academic programs, but in general specific programs or institutes within a single school of a university do not have the necessary notability for an encyclopedia, and should be included within the article for that school of college. I invite you to read WP:BFAQ for a comprehensive list of applicable policies, including WP:COI. As an administrator here who frequently helps universities and other institutions write acceptable articles, I urge you to get in touch with me, or one of the other editors who have commented. DGG (talk) 06:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The way to do it is to put a description of what you'd like to say on the talk page for article for the school, emphasizing only what is distinction. Then some editor who stops by, (like me) will say how good it is, format it, and put it in the article Remember, all similar schools have an internship of some sort, and many of them are required, and all probably make a big deal of them. the text was:

The Capstone program, at New York University’s Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service is part of the core curriculum of the MPA/MUP program. The program provides students with an opportunity to perform a public service while they learn. During their second year, students work in teams to conduct significant research or address a specific challenge, mostly in the public sector. Organizations and agencies can apply to enter into a Capstone partnership. Originally started with a grant from the Ford Foundation, the Capstone program is a service that the Wagner school provides to the world. A Capstone is the crowning piece of an arch, the center stone that holds the arch together, giving it shape and strength.

I've marked for strikeout what counts as straight PR rather than description. But the descriptive part is not unique. (It does not help that "Capstone" is now used in the academic world as the generic term for an internship, final seminar, or whatever. -- if you've got the name, you're stuck with it, but might not want to emphasise it.) So what is distinctive? does the work typically lead to publication? do the internship usually lead to positions after graduation? Are the places particularly prestigeous? What is special about it that you wont find at Harvard or Stanford or Princeton or Columbia? Was it perhaps one of the earliest that everyone else copied?

I know the style here always seems a little specialized and peculiar to people who do the normal sort of web site--or almost anything else.

Let me know when there is something to look at -- DGG. DGG (talk) 18:37, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WagnerLogo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WagnerLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 19:40, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Women of Color Policy Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Organization does not have independent wp:SIGCOV, sources are either passing mentions or not independant

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lenny Marks (talk) 20:51, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Taub Urban Research Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]