User talk:Okemutie

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Isiokoro, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Isiokoro was changed by Okemutie (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868657 on 2012-02-13T06:49:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:49, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ochuko Tonukari[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ochuko Tonukari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Amsaim (talk) 11:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ochuko Tonukari for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ochuko Tonukari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ochuko Tonukari (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 13:27, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ochuko Tonukari[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ochuko Tonukari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:57, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Ochuko Tonukari. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 15:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Ochuko Tonukari. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Amsaim (talk) 21:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ochuko Tonukari deleted per WP:CSD#G4[edit]

I'm sorry, but this is recreation of an article deleted pursuant to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ochuko Tonukari. If you feel this is sufficiently improved to recreate the article please appeal at WP:DRV. My opinion is it is not sufficiently improved in terms of sourcing and notability. Please see links on boiler plate below. Thanks Dloh cierekim 01:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion

Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.

I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into things to avoid.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written about the subject. Searching Google is the best place to start. Sometimes articles are deleted because they contain content copyrighted elsewhere. Such content can be used as a source of information, but the content here must be completely rewritten from scratch. Any deficiencies with notability, sourcing, or things to avoid should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.

For basic information on beginning to write an article see User:Dloh/new.

Sourcing is incredibly important for an encyclopedia. You will need reliable sources providing verifiable information. Be sure to list your sources at the bottom of the article.

For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion

If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.

Please read--

There is useful information at--

If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:Okemutie/sandbox and consider using the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page

Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh cierekim 01:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at the Isiokolo article[edit]

Hi there. Please take note that the Nigerian town "Isiokolo" is spelled with an "L", and this is the version that is being officially used by the Nigerian Government and the Press (check here and here). The historical name "Isiokoro" is no longer in use. The historical name Isiokoro can however be mentioned in the article text (see here). According to Wikipedia's Policy on article titles, "...all significant alternative titles, names, or forms of names that apply to a specific article should be made to redirect to that article." Please do not revert back to the old historical name. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 19:09, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ochuko Tonukari[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ochuko Tonukari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shirt58 (talk) 11:52, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International Scholars Journals[edit]

The article International Scholars Journals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable publisher. No independent reliable sources. Only notable feat is inclusion on Beall's list of predatory publishers. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 17:34, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Scholars Journals[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Scholars Journals, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Randykitty (talk) 17:35, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences[edit]

The article International Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Only notable feat is thatit is published by a publisher listed on Beall's list of predatory publishers. No independent sources, not listed in any selective major database. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 17:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Botany[edit]

The article African Journal of Botany has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

New journal, too young to be notable yet. Not indexed in any selective major databases, no independent sources. Publisher is on Beall's list of possible predatory publishers. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 11:30, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International Journal of Agricultural Sciences[edit]

The article International Journal of Agricultural Sciences has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal, not indexed in any selective database. Only claim to notability is being published by a predatory open access publisher that is on Beall's list. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 19:17, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of International Journal of Agricultural Sciences for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Journal of Agricultural Sciences is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Journal of Agricultural Sciences until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 20:45, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing[edit]

Hi, Repeatedly creating articles on inappropriate subjects really is disruptive. Please stop creating articles about yourself or about International Scholars Journals and its journals. International Scholars Journals is a predatory publisher of fake journals. If they get any worse, people might actually write about them and then they would become notable (for a lack of quality, not because they are any good), but as it is, this publisher and its journals are eminently non-notable. So please stop wasting your time and the time of the community who needs to clean up the mess. Creating new articles on WP is one of the hardest things to do. I recommend that you look around first at existing articles and try to contribute to those, before continuing to create new articles that keep getting deleted. If you continue the way you have been doing, I'm afraid that sooner or later you are going to find yourself blocked from editing. --Randykitty (talk) 21:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]