User talk:Oliverk25

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I like the general direction of this page. Obviously it will need more development, and I think the "Highlight debates/ controversy" is a important topic here, and I think it will be important to avoid possible bias when presenting the debates and the companies involved in the controversy. Jerrylin1208 (talk) 17:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These modifications to the existing article serve as a good foundation to build upon. I feel the topics that you discuss are very relevant. That being said, it is a bit skeletal. Rather than talking about the definitions of terms or concepts the article brings up, I'd rather it go into more depth over it's applications. Moreover, it would be helpful if you could add more examples of these policies in action. The article offers several good ones but not enough to provide full context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelsmani (talkcontribs) 17:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Oliverk25, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article problems[edit]

Some of your additions to the Corporate social responsibility article very close to the source you cited. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation, even if you cite the source. You need to re-state things in your own words; simply changing a few words in a sentence is still a copyright violation if the structure of the sentence is preserved. This was detected by automatic plagiarism detection software. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, your entire edit had to be deleted.
(If you reply to this message here, please include {{ping|Ian (Wiki Ed)}} in your response, to ensure that I see your reply.)
Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that in this edit to Corporate social responsibility, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 17:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]