User talk:Omega cyber turnip

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your comments supporting the deletion of the article should be copied over to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futurama (season 7), where the fate of the article is being decided. The comments on the article's talk page won't be considered, so you probably want to add your vote to the deletion discussion I linked. Majorclanger (talk) 17:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing fine. It's generally OK to reply either on your own page, or on the page of the other party. One thing you should start doing is "signing" your posts to talk pages with four tildes (~). That will automatically append your username and the timestamps and helps readers track the conversations. I now see that a bot has told you the same thing while I was typing this.
Oh yeah, welcome aboard! Cartoon articles attract a lot of vandals and other loonies, so it's great to see a new good contributor in that realm. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a message and I'll try to help or point you to where you can get help. Majorclanger (talk) 17:25, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh right, cool. Again, thanks a lot! I just left a post with some information over at the page you linked me to. Now, I'll see if I can do this signature thing properly this time. Omega cyber turnip (talk) 17:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wayah, it worked. Omega cyber turnip (talk) 17:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:20, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Silence of the Clamps for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Silence of the Clamps is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Silence of the Clamps until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CTJF83 17:52, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Futurama broadcast order[edit]

This debate is re-emerging at Talk:Futurama (season 6). Just thought I should warn you Thegreyanomaly (talk) 08:18, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Omega cyber turnip. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Omega cyber turnip. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Sol Harris has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of notoriety

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Alex 21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Alex_21 TALK 01:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the Reddit source you used failed WP:RS and WP:V, and is also now listed as "Comment deleted by user" on the source itself. -- Alex_21 TALK 01:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What was the exaggeration?[edit]

Where did I exaggerate in my edit summary? The only source establishing notability on the article was a Wordpress blog, which I have just removed as that is some random Internet user who started their own blog, not a published music critic. Also, it shouldn't go in Template:Music ratings, because the template should only have ratings with scores in it. The whole "Legacy" section was unsourced aside from one user-generated source (setlist.fm), which we can't use per WP:USERG, so that's all been removed. If you are actively editing articles, please tag it with Template:In use. Ss112 03:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it's your intent to restore all Electric Six's articles, I don't believe Mustang, Human Zoo and Fresh Blood for Tired Vampyres are notable. The first source that comes up for all three is presumably your own reviews (as they are by a user named "Turnip") on Sputnikmusic, which we can't use as they are user reviews per WP:ALBUMAVOID, and the only other sources reviewing them are non-notable blogs. If you restore those articles, I will nominate them for deletion. It's fine to be a dedicated fan of a band, but you have to acknowledge then that not everything they do will be notable. Some albums just don't get reviews from any noteworthy sources, and their later albums didn't win any awards nor chart, so that makes them fail WP:NALBUMS. Ss112 03:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can assure you those aren't my reviews despite the similar username. I don't actively review any music online. Omega cyber turnip (talk) 04:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One chronology on album articles[edit]

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 62#Multiple infobox chronologies. There is consensus to only have one chronology unless it's a collaborative album and multiple artists are involved. Thanks. Ss112 03:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]