User talk:Onorem/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Darren Winters

Regarding Darren Winters, it seems you are supporting his self promoting autobiography / advert. "Darren Winters’ life story is really one of rags to riches; he began his career in McDonalds flipping burgers and now he drives a Ferrari!" Please tell me how this is supposed to be neutral?? He studied and graduated in Exeter, used to run pyramid schemes, and now runs an elaborate scam!! Please do some research on Darren Winters, you will discover a man who brings tears and empties the bank accounts of thousands of people in the UK every year. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shyal-b (talk • contribs)

Ok, what would be concidered proof? I've been to one of his talks.. and have not stayed in touch with others there, but I am sure a lot of them never made a penny, and probably lost money using his techniques which are guaranteed. All who have made attampts at being re-imboursed have failed even though it was a clear part of the contract that if you didn't make the price of the course back within a year you'd get re-imboursed for the course. Should I run a pole? Sample feedback from customers at random, asking them if they believe it's a scam or not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shyal-b (talk • contribs)

Thanks I shall add a controversies section, discussing the articles. But I bet the price of a Darren Winters course it will get mysterious reverted by the IP editor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shyal-b (talk • contribs)

Ok great, no worries about calling my input nonsense, I'm new to editing anyway. I'm still unclear whether articles from journalists working for the Gardian, the BBC, and a financial website count as primary, or secondary sources.. also if they count as sufficient / reliable sources.. or not. Thanks for your time.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Shyal-b (talk • contribs)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Craig Smith.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Craig Smith.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:51, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Plz speedy delete it. Thanks --GravityTalk 14:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Ford (vehicles)

If Some more users would help work on ford vehicles it wouldn't be a large problem --User:Ceres 009

Cockapoo

Onorem, hey thank you for seeing my edit to the cockapoo page, but I was actually trying to make an addition to it since I heard that breed referred to as one on NPR the other day, here are some links to a few kennel and dog enthusiast sites that refer to a cockapoo as a cockerdoodle:

Thanks Hartneye 15:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. --Onorem 15:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
I must've been mistaken, but I'll look into it further, because I know that NPR referred to Cockapoo and Cockerdoodle as one and the same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hartneye (talk • contribs)
I just double checked my links that I gave you and none of them refer to cockerdoodles as cockapoo+poodle mixes, they refer to them as Cocker Spaniel and Poodle mixes, which is what a cockapoo/cockerdoodle is. I don't mean to be a pain but I just want to make sure accurate information is presented.Hartneye 15:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

your wrong

your wrong when u reverted dragon slayer back to the original setting, however, when the dragon slayer was changed to dragon slayer series, it was more correct. dragon slayer is not only a series of games it also has a definition. unfortunetly if you try to find a definition you could spend your whole life trying to find it and might not ever find it. so in fact dragon slayer is actualy the unofficial name of one matthew mumford. i should know because i am that matthew mumford. i am a geocasher and i have sent cashes acrost the world, i leave my name as dragon slayer. it started off as a joke with some of my friends and speard out. so please make the nessary corrections, or inform me as to how to make them myself. pplease contact me on my own page. Mjb007 23:27, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page...but your nickname doesn't deserve a page. --Onorem 23:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Chaplains of biochemistry

Ah right sure fair enough ,i'll just put the whole thing up when i get it done anyway, thanks very much and "pog mo thoin"! I'm only still getting used to the whole Wikipedia, anyway! "Ta suil agam gur faighenn to piain i do hoin as fearr mor grana" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Damien O'Riordan (talk • contribs)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my talk page from the vandalism. Betaeleven 14:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

everquest2

EDIT:

Alright, you're probably right.

T3hPiracy

UNOMIA

Yes, I agree. Delete Unomia. I was given inaccurate information. It is actually called Utopica. I was P.O.'d. Unomia needs to be deleted. We will try to start a Utopica page, its an agnostic type of philosophy. Unomia SHOULD be deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Woodstock2010 (talk • contribs) 06:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC).

User page

Thanks for fixing my user page: I just now noticed what was happening to it. Why, I have no clue. --Calton | Talk 14:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Katrina Cribs Follow-Up

In response to:

I just finished watching your video a few minutes ago, and unless it somehow gains media attention away from Wikipedia, I can't imagine any situation where I believe it belongs here. That's just my opinion though. It's something that should be decided on the talk page of the article. --Onorem 22:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

This link shows that our video is beginning to receive unsolicited media coverage outside of Wikipedia: www.chalmation.net It is the first post on the page.

RV User Page

Woah, never even noticed that vandalism - was too busy making sure other vandals got blocked!

Oh, and you didn't increase the count of my page vandalised userbox did you?

-- TheChrisD™ 12:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

References & Research

What do I put if the main source of reference comes from reading the book. I also don't know how to sign this so I will leave it as is.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Docski35 (talk • contribs)

It's not original cause I didn't make it up. Docski35 (talk · contribs)

Oh you'll see in 5 days I'll have so many links to gatsby and mockingbird conspiracy sights that your mind will blow. Just 5 days.Docski35 (talk · contribs)

I am going to post so many references that wikipedia will have to shut down because it doesn't have enough space. But right now I'm going to go eat pizza. Have a nice night. Blast you with resources tommorow.

Sincerely,

Docski35 02:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Somehow I doubt that...but enjoy your pizza. --Onorem 02:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

What if I can prove that I'm Harper Lee. Then do I get to keep the article?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Docski35 (talk • contribs)

Harper Lee wrote To Kill a Mockingbird, so wouldn't that be like the ultimate outside resource. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Docski35 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC).

Does wikipedia pay you or are you just administrator dude for the fun of it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Docski35 (talk • contribs) 23:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC).

Do you own a psp? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Docski35 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC).

All responses on your talk page. --Onorem 17:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the blanking of my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 18:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Anizone

Please stop adding the deletion code to The Anizone, it is a perfectly good article, and I have cited all sources. gameguider 14:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


I haven't written all of the article, just changed bits, the admin wrote most of it, so I'll tell him about it. gameguider 16:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Thanks for the help

You're welcome. Yeah, I rather doubt that he will be unblocked early given the huge amount of vandalism. Will (aka Wimt) 17:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Tennis articles

Im am not vandalizing im just updating score format thats all. thank you— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.155.113.55 (talk)

Replied on your talk page. --Onorem 14:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

I apologize for erasing the michael chang information. I did not mean to do it. However the format changes are the CORRECT ONES and I think you should do some research. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.155.113.55 (talk)

I have not used different IP'S. How can someone get different IP's. When ever I get blocked I STAY blocked. Also My alias is TENNIS GENIUS. nothing else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.155.113.55 (talk)

Quite easily actually, Tennis Genius. [Sentence removed] Also, there are other ways of doing it, but I'm not that familiar with these technique. But in answer to your question 'How can some get different IP's' it can be done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JakobSpooner (talk • contribs)
I removed part of this comment. There is no reason to give vandals more ideas about how to get around blocks --Onorem 14:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Don Murphy

Please do not revert the change I made. Per Wiki standards, personal forums in which the person partcipates ARE valid sources. Don Murphy says those are his films then they are his films. Why do you leave three of them and revert the fourth? You are out of line here and need to stop. Thank you PhilPhague 03:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to disagree. Mr. Murphy doesn't get to make up whatever he wants and post it to his forums so that it can be posted to his article. --Onorem 03:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page so quickly. Cheers! --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 12:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

To protect your page from vandalism

If you want to have your user page protected from vandalism, I think you should leave a request for semi-protection at WP:RFP. That way, the Wikipedia software will prevent anon users and new users from editing it, while allowing you to edit it. Eli Falk 12:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestion, but the vandalism really doesn't bother me enough to make additional work for the people over at WP:RFP. Reverting takes little effort, and the more time they spend on my user page, the less time they have to vandalize useful mainspace pages. --Onorem 12:54, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for reverting my talk page. The user is now reported to AIV - - Microtony 13:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting mine...and for reporting. --Onorem 13:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
The guy is now blocked indef =) - - Microtony 13:24, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my user page :) --Sylent 02:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Anytime. --Onorem 02:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


Tranzient

I left a message on the talk page for that wiki - basically I am hoping that by putting a wiki out there, others will add to the information available... not so easy if it is directly deleted.... --Firstiguana 12:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Some notability has to be established for it to become a stub that other people contribute to. At least one reliable source should be easy to find and add to the article if they are notable. --Onorem 12:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

"Spam" on "Homeschooling"?

Why would you delete my reference to Sonlight Curriculum, Ltd.--one of the major homeschool supply houses--from the Homeschooling article? You said it appeared to be spam. If so, why? If it is spam, then so are the references to Calvert School, Mary Pride, and The Old Schoolhouse magazine. . . .

Perhaps you could clarify your "policy" for policing this page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brightflash (talk • contribs) 05:36, 9 March 2007 (UTC).

Message from Leetnoob

Yeah - sorry for the inappropriate page - I thought they were just muck-around pages that you could post whatever you wanted on (providing copyright was not breached). Won't happen again - at least by me. Please feel free to delete it. --LeetnoobTalk 18:00, 10 March 2007 (GMT)

Revert. Test worked...

Allow me to compliment your sense of dry irony. Werewombat 21:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Internet slang phrases

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Internet slang phrases, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Internet slang phrases. Thank you. Pan Dan 23:20, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Template substitution

Sorry for my weird edit to the new {{reported}} template. If you continue to use it, might I suggest that you substitute it as described at Wikipedia:Template_substitution? Simply add "subst:" to the beginning, like so: {{subst:reported}} Cheers!--Chaser T 13:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC)


Don Murphy (again)

1- why is it that Murphy lists FOUR upcoming films on his personal site but you delete one of them? You claim above that he cannot "make up what he likes and post it here." How do you know that the documentary is made up? How do you know the other three are real? It seems to me you need all four listed or none of the four listed under your own rules. 2- The link to the Tarantino fight is a paragraph long and unclear. It is NOT mentioned in the body of the article. You need to either find backup or under strict BLP it must be omitted. 3- Do we now link to every video of someone? Murphy at a convention is not a worthwhile link. 4- Please try to be smarter when commenting on plagiarism. As you know, former pornographer Wales refuses to tolerate plagiarism. The Paul Watkins article is fully plagiarized. Groanio 20:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

whoops, there it is Groanio 23:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I never said it wasn't a copyright violation. I said the link you provided as the source didn't match the text, and the editor you accused didn't change any text related to the copyright violation. You made all the copyvio edits yourself. --Onorem 01:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

A question regarding copyright status Randy Smith

Was this permission given just to you, or did they contact the Wikimedia Foundation? --Onorem 11:41, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

I e-mailed Discovery Church and asked if I could use the web info on Wikipedia. Pastor Wade Birchfield said it would be fine. Thanks for the note, JLiker --JLiker 10:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

User page

Thanks for the revert. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a second time for the next reversion. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Anytime. Did I make more than one? --Onorem 12:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Brand Expansion

QUESTION....I have tried to post several times and each time I change content per your request.....I then finally get and acceptable post and then you forward that post to a more comprehensive post....so I say OK...looks good let me add a link with all the other external links that provide the same information......and you delete and give me a stop or die warning....Please explain...I do not understand how or what you want....I think I could add great value to the viewer but for some reason you don't see it the same....Please explain?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Franchise Consultant (talk • contribs)

Randy Smith

Question...I sent a copy of the e-mail giving permission to use the bio from the website to permission@Wikipedia.com Is this correct? JLiker 12:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC) JLiker

Actually, I think that permissions-en@wikimedia.org is the address to forward to. Forward both your request, and the reply giving permission. --Onorem 12:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Social Interaction (from Talk:Homeschool)

Onorem.....was looking again at the dispute yesterday, and I would like to try to say this about it:

I'm still not sure I understand this. What's wrong with saying, "They meet people at Church. They meet people at the playground. They meet the children of our own friends." What broad frame of reference do you need to simply comment about where children might run into peers?....I would think that would be a question you've heard often, and an answer shouldn't be all that difficult to give...

"I would think that would be a question you've heard often..." Sigh...OK...this is a reasonable statement.......and Yes....I have heard this question all too often....as all homeschoolers have....this is invariably the first question that people ask about homeschooling, and almost invariably the issue that they simply cannot get past. Obviously you can give straightforward answers just like the ones you listed above, but most of the time it doesn't do any good. After all; almost anyone can already think of these answers on their own, just as you yourself did. You can say all those things until you are blue in the face, and you can clearly demonstrate them to the point that the average person can intellectually concede the possibility; but that intellectual concession does not generally suffice because the average modern westerner simply cannot conceive of an existence – especially a childhood – apart from the frame of reference of institutional schooling. (I mean, even homeschoolers call it homeschool. John Holt didn't like that implication, so he called it unschool.) The "broad frame of reference" to which I refer is 1: An historical viewpoint that encompasses far beyond the boundaries of the last century or so of compulsory schooling, and, then, 2: A Biblical viewpoint that encompasses far beyond the boundaries of history.

Because at this point in time we ourselves grew up in schools, and our parents grew up in schools, and their parents, and their parents grew up in schools, we think of schooling as being the normal, and necessary, childhood experience. In point of fact, schooling is a profoundly abnormal childhood experience, and is not at all necessary. It is a profound deviation from what the childhood experience is supposed to be.

Or, look at it from this angle: The vast majority of non-homeschoolers, and some homeschoolers, look at schools basically this way, "School is a good environment for children from a social point of view; why can't they get their act together academically?" And this is the genesis of why many begin to look into homeschooling. But some homeschoolers, maybe even most, look at schools the other way around; "School is a horrible environment for kids socially! Maybe I can do better with my kids academically, and maybe not, but I'm sure not handing my kids over to them. They're my responsibility." In the early eighties Holt said that if there were no other reason than the socialization question to homeschool that would be more than enough.

I could go on like this for some time, but the main point is this: I know from experience (both my own and other's) that a straight answer on the socialization question is of almost no value, except perhaps for the rare individual who, on their own, is already on the cusp of making the decision to homeschool. The only way to get most people to "see" the value of the straight answer is to first get them to back up and take a much larger view of the situation.

Hope that helps. Darentig 15:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


DontUse article deletion

I would like to know why the article DontUse was setup for speedy deletion? The site does exactly as it states. It allows for user generated reviews of products. What part of the website "does not assert the importance or significance of that web location" We are currently adding more information to the wikipedia article about the website and importances of it. I would appreciate an explanation of how not enough information was provided. --Rhalverson 19:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Article: DontUse

Patsmom

Other account now also deceased. I've left the autoblock and the account creation block on, so that might be all we hear from the great nutter; if not, shout me. 〈REDVEЯS〉 20:43, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello Mrs. Winfrey

Someone told me you are Oprah. Truth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexanderBres (talk • contribs)

You heard incorrectly, but I would like to thank you for stopping by. --Onorem 03:38, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: March 6

Get a grip! There are 2 computers at my house and for some reason they both have the same IP adress! one of my MANY siblings got online and was posting the March 6 stuff. The next day it says i'm blocked! It also said

Your IP adress is-

- Blah blah blah! WTF? WWTTFF?? What's with this? BACK DOWN!! For crying out loud! Give me a break! Geez--Chikinpotato11 03:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Visionhealth

This article has been deleted twice already for violating copyright and blatant advertising. If you are going to write about this, you need to provide reliable sources so we can verify it. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 11:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm not looking to write about it. I'm the one who nominated it for deletion. --Onorem 11:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Randy Smith

re: A question regarding copyright status I sent a copy of the approval to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and have not heard anything. What is the status? Thanks JLiker --JLiker 19 March 2007

Ooops

Thanks for catching my mistake. Raul654 01:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Nephi Malit Article Deletion

I'm sorry, I don't really understand why my article about Nephi Malit was deleted. You tagged it for deletion. I could really use some help, I'm pretty new at this sort of thing. I'm revising my article, trying to add more information, to improve it. I'd appreciate any help. Thanks!redporcupine 04:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Burnsvillemike

I should welcome your comments at: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Burnsvillemike and the socks. Bridgeplayer 02:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For helping to root out a nasty mess of vandalism by sockpuppets, I award Onorem the Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. Seraphimblade Talk to me 09:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. Glad to help. --Onorem 11:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

3rr

I believe you should apply to that rule too. and you were the first person to use revert that page. Correct?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.155.121.56 (talk • contribs)

Count them. I'm fine. --Onorem 02:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

listen man im not trying to be a jerk here but I counted 4 reverts and you have recently added 2 changes to that page (which is fine by me).—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.155.121.56 (talk • contribs)

Count them again. 3 edits did nothing to remove your unsourced statement. --Onorem 02:21, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


The quote in the death star page is said by Darth Vader Himself in Star Wars Episode 4. That should be left alone by the both of us.

As far as the battle of France look man the Blitskrieg stunned the french and hitler thought that it would be able to work agaist the soviet union. The sixth army had never been beaten or even retreated before.

Any way way are you bothering me, cant you go bother some other guy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.155.121.56 (talk • contribs)

Regarding edits to Hook (film)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Onorem! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule petitiononline\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 03:00, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

The socks are breeding again

Thanks for dealing with the latest burst of socks - I have added a 4th new one; he is now editing Community Based Corrections, an Australian article! Bridgeplayer 18:46, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Just another thought, I am trying to track down and get deleted the images that he has uploaded. They are either vanity photos of Mike Satter or copyvio (mainly of Tim Pawlenty). You can see the latest batch here. If when you revert a sock it would be helpful if you could also check the images. Thanks. Bridgeplayer 19:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Just wanted to say thanks (again!) for so quickly reverting vandalism on my talk page. --Ed (Edgar181) 13:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Anytime. --Onorem 13:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


please do not edit

the 11:11 numerology site is promoting and advertising for things that have nothing to do with numerology. to say they do, is to lie. thanks! :)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesuslawyer (talk • contribs)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onorem/Archive_3&oldid=1144699898"