User talk:Oogles

Hi peeps :D

Welcome!

Hello, Oogles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Martin Porcheron 15:02, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Pph 7.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pph 7.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

ANI thread[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Oogles, CIR concerns Ribbet32 (talk) 21:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh right, here it is Oogles (talk) 02:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I closed this ANI tread, as it was going nowhere useful, I will warn you that your attitude in that dispute was suboptimal, when in in a dispute don't just criticize the other person, try to understand why they disagree and try to work together. If someone brings you to ANI, try to understand what they think you did wrong, and if you think you did nothing wrong argue that, don't just rehash the original content dispute all over again. Tornado chaser (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good job there chief, of nothing that was ever important Oogles (talk) 02:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I attempted to give you as many bullets as I could. But yet, the person who filed it maybe did so prematurely, DO YOU THINK?Oogles (talk) 02:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3rd, I don't care about my attitude in a disagreement, There was no actual disagreement, and called in a 3PO, when there had been NO ACTUAL DISAGREEMENT yet. What the fuck is a 3PO gonna have to say - really, when he hasn't even TALKED first. NOTE the user who did so was VERY HAPPY to do it. And has done so in the past against other users. So, fuck off Oogles (talk) 02:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: I would have been equally happy if it was a lifetime ban (and for -what- still waiting to hear what that is) that would have made all my contributions to wiki (in terms of funding, and actual edits) terribly funny. Though, most of my edits are IP and small things, not from same IP, some might be. But that changes. Oogles (talk) 02:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you told that guy to go fuck off. Thanks. Oogles (talk) 02:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note I won't edit an article with that kind of language - or even a talk page (when it's not the tone). Oogles (talk) 02:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And furthermore, Fuck you too - didn't "sistertwister" archive it?Oogles (talk) 02:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I don't know who your ranting about here [1], but you need to be WP:CIVIL and avoid telling other editors to "fuck off". Tornado chaser (talk) 15:29, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uh huh Oogles (talk) 22:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So starting now can you fu.. stop editing talk page. Thanks. Oogles (talk) 22:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you wanted bullets, I was more than happy to provide - so fuc.. I mean thanks. Oogles (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The archived CIR on ---> Oogles (talk) 22:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bullets? Tornado chaser (talk) 12:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ammunition? You can view the archived thread, if you'd like. Oogles (talk) 05:00, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bye now Tornado, see ya round friend Oogles (talk) 05:01, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Oogles. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Oogles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]