User talk:P. Romanus

February 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Ted Cruz are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 22:33, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:United States presidential election, 2016, you may be blocked from editing. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 22:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't bow before freemasons! --P. Romanus (talk) 22:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That has nothing to do with this. This is about the rules of Wikipedia regarding talk pages. I highly suggest you read WP:NOTFORUM as I have pointed out multiple times. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 22:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016. Majora (talk) 22:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, another agent tries to threaten me and America. --P. Romanus (talk) 22:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Looking at your edits, I've blocked you per WP:NOTHERE. If you wish to be unblocked, please give examples of some constructive edits you may wish to make. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

P. Romanus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Free opinion, free speech, democracy and personal freedom! In an (allegedly) free country I can post my opinion and/or my appells whereever I wanna! It's a good advice for every American citizen to vote for Ted Cruz in order to save America and the world!

Decline reason:

Of course you cannot post your opinion wherever you wanna; you've the right to your opinion; Wikipedia is under no obligation to publish it. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I cannot officially review your unblock request because I'm not an administrator, but I can 100% guarantee you that that reasoning isn't going to work. Read this page to understand why it won't work. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 23:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]