User talk:PaintbrushArt

This is PaintbrushArt's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ralph Garafola (March 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Please provide multiple independent reliable sources, not associated with the artist, who have written about his work. He may be notable, but the author needs to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ralph Garafola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! PaintbrushArt, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PaintbrushArt (talk) 20:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added links from articles and artwork that were published by other publishers/local newspapers. Connection Magazine, Warren Patch, Warren Showcase and Independent Press. I also included website of Art Center Sarasota where Garafola teaches. The copy was written by that person that runs the classes. There are also many images available via google search under Ralph Garafola.

if this is not satisfactory, please be more specific in what you are requesting. Thank you

Speedy deletion nomination of Ralph Garafola[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Ralph Garafola, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. | Naypta^✉ opened his mouth at 17:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ralph Garafola (March 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ralph Garafola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi PaintbrushArt! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:26, Tuesday, March 29, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ralph Garafola (April 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

See WP:Referencing for beginners, still needs to focus with any additional amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall. Applicable notability is WP:CREATIVE and, if his art had been collected by major museums, this would've automatically been notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ralph Garafola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ralph Garafola (May 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The Awards and Press sections appear to be indiscriminate unformatted run-on lists. They do not add content and do not show notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ralph Garafola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ralph Garafola (May 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

You still aren't formatting the references correctly. I did ones in the background paragraph so you can see how it is done. You cannot include "http" links in the text. You have written this like a web page, but WP uses a different style. That is covered in wp:SMOS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ralph Garafola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 22:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ralph Garafola (July 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:

Notability of the person is not shown in this draft. Please read Wikipedia's notability guidelines for more details. And also, you may need to summarize the points in Portraits Around the Nation, Awards and Pressor transfer them to a Wikitable, because they look unnecessarily diffuse in the current draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ralph Garafola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O (talk) 11:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ralph Garafola[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ralph Garafola, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 23:19, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Hi, thanks for message. In case you didn't see the edits, the draft was declined by Tseung Kwan O who said Notability of the person is not shown in this draft. Please read Wikipedia's notability guidelines for more details. And also, you may need to summarize the points in "Portraits Around the Nation" It was then nominated for deletion by another editor as obvious spam.

I deleted your article because

it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to him, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what he claims or interviewing him. Most of the text is either unsourced or sourced to unacceptable sites
More seriously, it was written in a highly promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: became one of New Jersey's best photo retoucher [sic]... still lifes capture the personality and character of his subjects while his landscapes and seascapes capture the mood of the scenes... Garafola says, "All my paintings are portraits. Whether my subject is a person, landscape, seascape or still life, my approach is to portray my subject in its natural environment. It puts the viewer inside the painting. My paintings realistically depict what nature has created. (quoting self-praise is spam) ...ultimate sacrifice made by our heroes so we can continue living with the freedoms we have in our nation... this beautiful painting that can be personalized with the photo of your hero – creating a heartfelt work of art that truly honors their sacrifice. You can purchase a giclee reproduction with your Hero’s [sic] photo inserted into the frame. (you didn't forget the sales pitch!)— and on and on, at best a gushing hagiography, at worse blatant spam/sales leaflet
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. that's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to sales sites. External links shouldn't include social media.
Your edits indicate that you have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. That's particularly the case if you are him, closely associated with him, or you are being remunerated for writing this highly promotional text by him or his publisher.
If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that he is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
others that were helping me commented. I see no comments or edits by other editors on the page or its talk page. If you are not editing as an individual, please desist, it is not permitted to operate a joint account or act on behalf of a company. Your man may well be notable, but a mishmash based on unacceptable references, gushing spam and outright sales talk does him no favours.

Please declare any COI, and I'll then see if there is anything worth salvaging. Also see Frida Kahlo as an example of a reasonable good article, so you can see how to reference the article and write facts, not fantasy. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HI Jim, I better understand with this explanation. If you can help me get my article back I can correct it. I am writing about an artist because I admire his work and teachings. Please if you can just get me the work that was done so far I can fix it. Regards, PaintbrushArt PaintbrushArt (talk) 16:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]