User talk:Patasaunii7

August 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Second Anglo-Afghan War‎ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 12:43, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of wars involving Afghanistan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:44, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of wars involving Afghanistan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Warning: one more revert by you will break the three revert rule. Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 16:48, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I am mistaken, you have two reverts before the rule is broken. My apologies. However, you still should avoid edit warring by using the talk page instead of reverting. Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 17:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Second Anglo-Afghan War. Scuoise (talk) 03:13, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:12, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]