User talk:Peterh5322
If you look at the software code for IECVEXCP and IEFUCBOB you'll see the programmer ID PDMS. MS is for Matthew Sabins, me, you'll see that ID for the last 10 years. I strongly suspect you don't know how the code actually works or what has changed in the last couple of years. We shouldn't document what things used to do but actually what they do.
Also please sign your posts.
Thecodemachine (talk) 06:33, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Welcome[edit]
|
- Hi, if with this edit you were trying to split off some content to EXCP, you should edit that redirect and turn it into an article. To do so, click on the link, and when it takes you to the destination, find the little "redirected from..." link top left, and click on that. Then you can edit the redirect. cheers, Rd232 talk 01:44, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
May 2011[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Execute Channel Program, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 04:19, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
The article Load Program Status Word instruction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 03:29, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Load Program Status Word instruction for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Load Program Status Word instruction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Load Program Status Word instruction until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 23:50, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
September 2011[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 20:58, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. –BMRR (talk) 17:10, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
"Also referred to as SYS=xxx"[edit]
I presume "Also referred to as SYS=xxx" refers to a system generation parameter. If so, you should probably say so, for the benefit of those reading the article who aren't familiar with the details of OS/360 system generation. Guy Harris (talk) 21:57, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification[edit]
Hi. In List of 50 kW AM radio stations in the United States, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page KLOK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
17.5mm film[edit]
I saw your addition to Film perforations and while interesting - it doesn't have anything to do with Film perforations... perhaps you would be better creating an article at 17.5mm film or adding it to 35mm film. Megapixie (talk) 21:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification[edit]
Hi. When you recently edited 35 mm film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matte (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 20[edit]
Hi. When you recently edited North American Radio Broadcasting Agreement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KNX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Swan (nuclear explosive)[edit]
You reverted an edit aimed at improving the grammar/style of the article without explanation or discussion. That is not constructive. Don't do that. Bomazi (talk) 23:43, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Do you have any citations for machine tool drives currently using thyratrons? You don't mean, perhaps, thyristors (solid state devices), not the vacuum tube thyratron? --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
The SD39 was added to the EMD Catalog at the request of Southern Pacific's request for a six axle locomotive of 2300 horsepower. See the Trains Magazine Article December 1968, "A Market Oriented Catalog" by Wallace A. Abbey. The same article appears in Kalmbach's Our GM Scrapbook pages 82–83 subtitle, "Little diesel, big job".
Disambiguation link notification for August 19[edit]
Hi. When you recently edited EMD SDP40F, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Fe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
December 2012[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rose Bowl Game. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Ucla90024 (talk) 05:57, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
June 2013[edit]
Hello, I'm LFaraone. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bob LeMond because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! LFaraone 21:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
The Academy ratio[edit]
IF (and only IF) what you state, below is TRUE, then 1.33:1 really should be 1.3333333333333333... all the way out to an infinite number of digits, as 4:3 is an irrational number.
HOWEVER, the Academy, and many others, have standardized on A/Rs specified to TWO significant digits, hence 1.37:1 (Academy), 1.66:1 (which is also irrational), 1.75:1 (which is not irrational), 1.85:1, 2.00:1 (rarely seen), 2.21:1, 2.35:1 and 2.55:1, and a few others for so-called "special venues".
The actual ratio, as projected, is seldom any one of those, as each theater usually "filed" its aperture plates from undersized plates, so as to properly fill its own screen dimensions, which very rarely actually matched one of the ratios mentioned, above.
With specific regards to "Dr. T", the titles were composed for 1.37:1, as that was what Three-Strip Technicolor was at that time. Projecting "Dr. T" at any other ratio doesn't make sense.
By the time of "Caine", Three-Strip had been modified to accommodate both 1.37:1 AND 1.85:1, and the titles, and the non-title compositions took the wider A/Rs into account.
Essentially, after "Shane", Technicolor was prepared to support 1.37, 1.66, 1.75 and 1.85, with 1.37 and 1.85 being the favorites.
Of course, 1.33 was also supported as those features eventually made it to TV, where the ratio is indeed 4:3/1.33:1, and Technicolor provided special low-contrast TV prints for those cases.
Regarding your partial reversion of my recent edit to The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T, your edit summary claim that "[t]here has never been a 1.375:1 A/R" is startling, to say the least.
A projection aperture measuring 0.600 x 0.800 inches (3:4 or 1:1.333...) was tentatively specified in late 1929 (as published in the JSMPE in January 1930, page 119[1]), but 0.600 x 0.825 inches (which is exactly 1:1.375) was the standard finally settled on in 1932, as may be confirmed by countless subsequent mentions in the JSMP[T]E and other standard technical literature, this convenient graphic at the excellent WideScreen Musuem site, and Wikipedia's own Academy ratio article, which was in superior form immediately after these edits by Jack Theakston, aka Thephotoplayer, a widely known and highly regarded bona fide expert on historical film technology with actual long-time hands-on professional experience projecting vintage 35 mm prints in all formats.
My beef is with the widespread deplorable practice of truncating the fraction to two decimal places. In order, as it seems, simply to save one alphanumeric character, a number that every adolescent ought to recognize as the decimal equivalent of 3/8 is transformed into a fraction as mystifying and seemingly irrational as 1.77:1. As this is a matter of form rather than fact, it is not worth getting into an edit war over, but if the mistaken claim made in your edit summary was your only basis, perhaps you will be so kind as to undo the reversion.
BTW, although "Dr. T" was indeed filmed with the expectation that it would be projected 1.375:1, it was released after the changeover to wider ratios was underway and actually shown masked to 1:85:1 in many theaters (see this interesting and very well-documented article). Try watching it cropped to 1.77:1 sometime, by zooming it to fill a widescreen monitor, and see what a mess even that somewhat less severe ratio makes of the compositions. If centered, heads are brutally truncated. If the the top of the image is favored, which was in fact Columbia's theatrical practice, other and sometimes no less important details are lopped off. That transition period cannot have been a happy time for discerning viewers. AVarchaeologist (talk) 14:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 24[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of IBM magnetic disk drives, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages TSO and MVT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 29[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Job Entry Subsystem 2/3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SVS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
April 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nikon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * (1994) LS-3510AF (4096x6144, 4000 dpi, 30 bits per pixel) Auto-focus SCSI (usually employed on Mac platforms with a Photoshop plug-in.
- * (1995) LS-4500AF (4 x 5 inch and 120/220 formats, 1000x2000 dpi, 35mm format 3000x3000. 12bit A/D. SCSI. Fitted with
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 30 April[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Nikon page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tabula rasa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- a good parse, or a good machine language translation of the same, or a "fail", and nothing else).
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:25, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zilog Z80 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [memory refresh|refresh]] mechanism that would otherwise have to be provided by external circuitry (although this necessarily reduced the i-fetch access from 3 cycles to 2 cycles, and, therefore,
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:26, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Quick bread may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- powder is ''[[Calumet_Baking_Powder_Company|Calumet]]'', first introduced in West Hammond, IL (later called [[Calumet City]], IL/[[Hammond, Indiana|Hammond]] IN in 1889. Both forms of food-grade
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:30, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Electric power system may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- capacitors are often placed near inductive loads to reduce current demand on the power system (i.e, increase the [[Power factor|power factor]], which may never exceed 1.0, and which represents a
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:29, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 14[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zilog Z80, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SASI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 12 June[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Colorburst page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Frank DeRemer[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Frank DeRemer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.
--Cargeek100 (talk) 23:44, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello!
I see you've been adding information to the article Hot metal typesetting, and I wonder if you can help me make the article better. I know very little about typesetting, but I am happy to add wikilinks (if I know which article to send them to), change technical language into less technical language, and add references.
If you're happy to tell me references which support the various facts in this article, I am happy to add those references to the article in the proper way. For example, if there are a couple of sources which will back up a whole paragraph or two, that's fine. Alternatively, if a sentence here or there needs some other reference, let me know that too. I know nothing about typesetting, so I don't even know where to begin: can this all be found in a few standard works?
I'm also going to try adding wikilinks and make the article easier to read for people who know nothing about typesetting, but the problem is that I might send the links to the wrong pages, and I might accidentally make sentences inaccurate. Could you check my edits, and let me know (either on my talk page or the article talk page) if I make a mistake, preferably letting me know how to correct it? Thanks.
I look forward to working with you.
Skittle (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
What was the RAMAC price and capacity?[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Hard_disk_drive#An_End_To_The_RAMAC_Price_Duologue. Please help end the duologue on capacity and price of the IBM RAMAC Model 350 disk file. Thanks. Tom94022 (talk) 21:51, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Capacity was 5,000,000 6-bit characters (character mode) or 833,333 36-bit words (word mode).
Lease price was $3,200 per month and could not be purchased as the consent decree had yet to be imposed. The consent decree would eventually mandate that IBM provide both lease and purchase prices, and that third-party lessors could purchase equipment with IBM being required to maintain that equipment for a separate maintenance price per month.
The complete separation occurred within the early-System/370 timeframe, and thereafter it was not uncommon to find monthly rentals (from the third-party) at about 0.0172 times the IBM list price (that is, 1.72 percent of purchase price, per month), meaning the payout period was about 58 months, which was actually rather optimistic as the technology was advancing at a much more rapid pace. 0.0172 was considered very aggressive. A more realistic rate, although still somewhat aggressive, considering that Amdahl was about to drop its bomb on the hopelessly outdated System/370 Model 168 and above marketplace, would be 0.027, or about a 36 month payout.
Yes, I once worked for a company which had a 0.0172 rate, so I know with certainty that such leases were indeed possible.
And, yes, that lessor eventually went belly-up, but by that time the Model 168 had been replaced by a 3090.
Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of North American broadcast station classes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KQW. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eastman Color Positive, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cyclopaedia.fr/wiki/Eastman_Color_Negative.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:46, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 1[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Channel I/O, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PSW. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
April 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm Voidxor. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of railroad truck parts, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – voidxor (talk | contrib) 21:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of railroad truck parts, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – voidxor (talk | contrib) 04:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
EMD 1010/265[edit]
Hey, I'm trying to merge the existing EMD 265 engine info into the 1010 article and there's an IP address user who is mucking it up. Do you want to weigh in at all on the talk pages? The 1010 is basically an improved Tier IV 265 and I think putting them together into a 1010 engine family makes sense.Sturmovik (talk) 18:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
The heads are quite different, as are, I assume, the pistons; therefore a quite different power assembly. The block and crank may indeed be the same. The induction system, including the turbochargers and the intercoolers, are quite different.
The 265 was a failure in North America, although it was moderately successful in China and India.
I would prefer to retain the EMD 1010 page as the main article, and then incorporate as sub-text the 265 information.
I have spent most of my research on EMC/EMD 567/645/710 series, and have only a passing interest in EMD 265/1010.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
March 2016[edit]
Hello, I'm Opencooper. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Psycho (1960 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Opencooper (talk) 18:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Peterh5322. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your material needs sources to back it up and make it verifiable. I moved it to the talk page but maybe you didn't notice. Talk:Receiver (firearms)#Unsourced text. You restored it without adding any references. Without sources the material may be deleted at any time. Felsic2 (talk) 18:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- I've moved it to the talk page again. Please discuss it there. Or simply find sources. Everything else in the article has sources. Felsic2 (talk) 23:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 1[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Detroit Diesel Series 71, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SAE. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
May 2017[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Mohave Power Station, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 06:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Peterh5322. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 24[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Combination square, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rule (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Peterh5322. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 27[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KFMB (AM), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KGU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:41, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for February 12[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited EMD SD60, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CIT.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 10[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Animation camera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Homage.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Removing spaces from the quote[edit]
Hi Perth5322, I reverted your edit at Orson Welles as per MOS:TYPOFIX. The spaces that you removed are in the original quote & should thus be preserved. Peaceray (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
November 2023[edit]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Boogie Nights. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 1[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KSCO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CP.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)