User talk:Pizzazboy

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Pizzazboy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 23:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched Studies[edit]

Usually alums have to have a Wikipedia article before they're considered notable.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 23:10, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Merrian-Webster defines "notable" as "remarkable; worth noticing; very successful". For some people, Mr. Zilberbrand has all 3 of these quealities , to others he has only 2, to others he has only 1, and to a select few he has not one. The same dictionary defines "alumnus" as "someone who was a student at a particular school". The reasoning for Mr. Zilberbrand being a alumnus is much simpler than the reasoning for being "notable". I am sure you can figure it out by now that Mr. Zilberbrand was, in fact, a student at this particular school! Thank you for your time!

Well, Wikipedia defines "notable" as "the quality of being able to have an article" on Wikipedia. See WP:N. So write an article on the guy and then you can list him. Also, this should be on the article talk page. Thank you for your time!— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 04:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now's the part where you talk about it on the article talk page[edit]

I started sections there, so you can explain why you think that material ought to be included in the article.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 23:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched Studies. Thank you.--Arxiloxos (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Cwobeel. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched Studies because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. - Cwobeel (talk) 04:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 08:41, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched Studies, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 08:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this template is more appropriate, considering.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia.