User talk:PlanetStar/Archive 5

Kepler-9[edit]

Hey, BlueEarth. :D

I was wondering if you could find set aside a bit of time to see if there is anything I might need to add to the Kepler-9 article. I don't have access to astrophysical journals, so I figured that there might be something I'm missing.

Thank you for taking the time to consider my request.

--Starstriker7^(Talk) 20:31, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Constellation Family for deletion[edit]

The article Constellation Family is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constellation Family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me what makes this a reliable source. Just because a website exists about something doesn't mean it's automatically notable. You'd need multiple, reliable websites and books, not just one single site. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:17, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that most websites are reliable. This website is seds.org, so you think it’s reliable? In fact, I found couple more sites on google. You can search google about constellation families. So we can use more than one refs to this article. BlueEarth (talk | contribs) 21:01, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been saved. Congratulations. And again, thank you for your astronomical input over the years to Wikipedia. Thor Dockweiler (talk) 20:44, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!!!! BlueEarth (talk | contribs) 22:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! Thor Dockweiler (talk) 02:15, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for List of Washington Nationals no-hitters[edit]

On 19 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of Washington Nationals no-hitters, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 06:11, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for no-hitter lists[edit]

Hello. Pls see T:TDYK#Articles created/expanded on February 12 & T:TDYK#Articles created/expanded on February 11. You might want to put in some unique prose (text that is not duplicated in related lists) if you're interested in getting your no-hitter lists on DYK. Hope this helps. --PFHLai (talk) 11:52, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Legend for List of Stars tables in various Constellations[edit]

Hello, once again. I created a template and have put a footer legend to the star list table for the first 5 constellation articles (Andromeda, Antlia, Apus, Aquarius, Aquila). Done to help provide info for those that print out articles or to provide further explanation. Just soliciting your opinion before I go to the effort of putting it on all of the constellations. For example, see List of stars in the constellation Andromeda. Kindest astronomical regards, Thor Dockweiler (talk) 05:10, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Red Square Nebula.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Red Square Nebula.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I forgot to license this image. BlueEarth (talk | contribs) 23:08, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Links to box score[edit]

Sorry Blue Earth I know that I should add them but when I update the scores at work (don't tell my boss), my internet is blocked so I can not copy and paste the link for the box scores. If I update them at my personal computer I will always add the link for the box score. Are you also a White Sox fan? -- --carthage44 (talk) 00:28, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, big time!! Yeah I noticed before that you add game results to game log but not the boxscore links. So I had to add those links. BlueEarth (talk | contribs) 20:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of extrasolar planets[edit]

Number of discovered extrasolar planets is reached 573. You can refresh info in this articles:

List of extrasolar planets detected by timing

List of extrasolar planets directly imaged

List of extrasolar planets detected by microlensing

List of transiting extrasolar planets

List of extrasolar planets detected by radial velocity

--Lacpurnis3 (talk) 17:54, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of extrasolar planets 2[edit]

Number of discovered extrasolar planets is reached 684. You can refresh info in this articles:

List of extrasolar planets detected by timing

List of extrasolar planets directly imaged

List of extrasolar planets detected by microlensing

List of transiting extrasolar planets

List of extrasolar planets detected by radial velocity

--Lacpurnis2 (talk) 06:54, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey for new page patrollers[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello PlanetStar/Archive 5! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Lists of no-hitters by franchise[edit]

Category:Lists of no-hitters by franchise, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:58, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kepler-20[edit]

CAn you add Kepler-20 to the List of exoplanetary host stars, my editing chops arent advanced enough to do so.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:12, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]