User talk:Polyssotsky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please leave any messages below:

Polyssotsky, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Polyssotsky! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Reverts[edit]

What’s the issue with your reverts? They are both British and English. Big deal Scf1985 (talk) 21:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No big deal, just you seem to be making unsourced edits which are purely subjective. Why not focus on adding content to improve the value of the information in the article rather than just making possibly controversial alterations? Polyssotsky (talk) 14:40 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Polyssitsky. As a life-long native speaker of British English, I can safely say I have never heard anyone ever say "throve" as the past tense of "thrive" and until your edit I had never seen it written either! Consistent with Collins here, I suspect "throve" may be an acceptable American English word, but for Mike Leigh we are probably better sticking with "thrived", or else re-wording. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It may be that throve is unfamiliar to you. According to the OED, however, and my copy of the concise Oxford Dictionary, throve is the past tense of thrive (as drove is for drive) and thrived is a lesser alternative. Remember WP is not about experience or opinion but about verified content. Polyssotsky (talk) 10:32, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Toots and the Maytals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Muirofsara. Thank you. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 00:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How convenient for you - not the first admin to pick on people whose inputs don't align with your POV and edits as I can plainly spot. Never mind, I've found a better site to work with. Do whatever you want. I'm not coming back--Polyssotsky (talk) 12:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Muirofsara per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mevagiss. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cabayi (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]