User talk:Punty Jon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Punty Jon, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Punty Jon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Test section 1.[edit]

Test section. Testing

Proposing merging Murano glass/ Venetian glass[edit]

Dear Punty Jon. I see that you recently voiced interest in merging Murano glass/ Venetian glass. A merge proposal has been opened at Talk:Murano glass. Thank you for your valued input. Apologies for the earlier edit, that was for the Venetian glass talk page. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 20:53, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Punty Jon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Murano glass[edit]

Hello Punty Jon. As information, I have redone the Murano glass page with plenty of footnotes and (hopefully) better writing. I don't care about Murano glass vs. Venetian glass—either choice is fine with me. Your user page indicates that you are a collector of glass. My "collection" consists of a bowl from Murano, an early 1900s jar from Sneath Glass Company, and some engraved stemware my relatives claim was made by Fostoria. I am visiting the Corning Glass Museum in a few days—have you been there and is there anything special I should see? TwoScars (talk) 13:05, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Murano Glass Reply[edit]

Hi, TwoScars. Thanks for your work on Murano glass. Yes, I am a collector of contemporary glass art, primarily one-of-a-kind blown and cast objects. You will enjoy CMOG. I cannot help much in the way of what to see in all the historical sections (many of which are fascinating); the Heineman collection of contemporary glass is a must-see in my view. Let me know what you enjoyed most after your visit. -Punty Jon- Punty Jon (talk) 16:37, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spent 3 or 4 hours at CMOG and saw just about everything. Saw the Heineman collection—my wife liked the Toso chess set and knew of the artist David Chihuly. I'm more into the history, glass companies, and how it was made. I'm now convinced that Venetian glass and Murano glass should be combined into Venetian glass with a redirect for Murano glass. CMOG rarely mentioned Murano—everything was Venetian or Venice. TwoScars (talk) 18:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Punty Jon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]