User talk:Pushbutton auto

Welcome!

Hello, Pushbutton auto, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 12:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suppressed evidence in Bain case[edit]

I have reverted your addition of a section about suppressed evidence to our David Bain article, because it was entirely unsourced. This material is controversial, and its publication elsewhere may have been the subject of legal action, so I think we need to be cautious about adding this to his article. I've opened a discussion about it on the article's talk page; please join in there and help us decide whether and how to cover this issue. -- Avenue (talk) 03:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:David Bain for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you.-gadfium 20:46, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Neilson[edit]

Please take some lessons at WP:Sandbox. You not only broke the link to Willie Neilson, but also buggered up another to Gordon Neilson.--MacRusgail (talk) 10:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, someone buggered it all up with those STUPID redirections.

The players name is WALTER GORDON NEILSON not Gordon Neilson.

and Willie NEILSON, what a crock of sh* , I thought nicknames were extra, their proper names should never be overuled/redirected.

and his brother is ROBERT THOMSON NEILSON, not Robert Neilson.

I am gonna get all those redirections reversed and get those biographies rewritten correctly.

Pushbutton auto (talk) 10:50, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to David Bain. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.-gadfium 06:52, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011[edit]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to David Bain. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -gadfium 03:33, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

I have blocked you for repeated WP:NPOV and WP:BLP violations at the David Bain article.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 06:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Thomson (shipbuilder)[edit]

The article George Thomson (shipbuilder) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability other than he started a shipbuilding firm - there's no article on that firm and I can't find sources on either firm or person. My feeling is that neither are notable enough for an article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 14:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for personal attacks at Talk:Joe Karam[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 18:39, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[edit]

Sorry, I fat fingered rollback and you edited before I could revert. little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer 02:30, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Pushbutton auto. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bain family murders. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 14:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Pushbutton auto. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Pushbutton auto. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Your remark has been reverted. OrewaTel (talk) 01:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just stopping by because I wanted to say pretty much the same. And given that you've had issues with this kind of behaviour before, maybe it's time for you to consider some self-moderation. Schwede 66 05:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]