User talk:RXFire1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, RXFire1, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 23:06, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Failed bid section of Tejas[edit]

Hai @RXFire1, I've seen your edit and the summary. Are you okay if I restore it to the previous version, I mean the summarised one? If you're not satisfied with the summary, you can add a one line stating why it failed in the bid. What do you say? FoxtAl (talk) 06:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't revert, I'll try to cut down sections especially Malaysia & Argentina. RXFire1 (talk) 06:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Thank you. FoxtAl (talk) 06:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

India has problem making AMCA[edit]

You care about discussing? I'm sure we can sort this out. Echo1Charlie (talk) 11:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RXFire1: It's not about what that article states. I'll create a talk section in the said article. We can discuss it there. I'm sure I can convince you there. For the time being, I'm removing the said content. But don't worry, we can add that later if it warrants. Echo1Charlie (talk) 13:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the articles, they state that India at present doesn't have the capacity to build the aircraft in the estimated time period. They're not putting down India, merely stating difficulties that India faces and offer solutions. Rahul Bhatia states that the "Tejas Mark II it is a much safer bet. Unlike the AMCA, the Tejas Mark II is not a brand-new aircraft being developed from scratch, but rather an improvement on an existing platform that involves a smaller leap in technology." "Meanwhile, the AMCA program should continue, albeit on a more realistic timeline. Not only will the experience of building the Tejas Mark II almost certainly assist in the development of the AMCA, but it will also serve to nurture India’s defense aerospace base and allow private players to absorb more advanced technologies."[1]

Shantanu Roy-Chaudhury states that "The gap in hardware quality is undesirable for India’s aspirations. With the way things are looking, the IAF will not induct any fifth-generation fighters even by 2035 which is around the time when sixth-generation fighter aircraft will start to arrive. The government in New Delhi, therefore, needs to rethink how it wants to proceed, with decisions made in the next few years being crucial for the capabilities of the IAF along with the indigenous fighter aircraft industry. With the current state of the defence industry in India plagued by delays and aircraft which are not matching expectations, a coherent strategy towards a sixth-generation fighter aircraft has not yet entered Indian strategic thinking, let alone the specifications which the IAF would require for it. India does not have the technical capabilities, know-how, and experience of building successfully proven fighter aircraft from scratch. It is thus imperative that India joins a sixth-generation fighter aircraft programme to help strengthen the indigenous defence industry and to lay out a sustainable development trajectory for the future of airpower. It is also important from a geopolitical perspective to not get left behind and be playing catch up when India’s neighbours include an increasingly assertive China and Pakistan." [2]

February 2024[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on [[:HAL AMCA]]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Echo1Charlie (talk) 16:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RXFire1&oldid=1210439211"