User talk:Relativityman

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Relativityman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 14:55, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm RockMagnetist. Your recent edit to the page Physical constant appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RockMagnetist (talk) 23:23, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry dude...[edit]

... but your physics is excrement. $\alpha$ is dimensionless and c does not '"have a different value in a frame of reference moving relative to the home frame and is dependent on the relative speed"' and there is no notion of '"home frame"' in current physics. Please leave crackpottery out of Wikipedia. 70.109.185.7 (talk) 17:05, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of all my edits by uninformed editors.[edit]

I cannot find any valid reasons for disallowing my edits (except for the invalid citation) in any of their comments; they all seem to be matters of opinion based on some theory or another rather than laws of physics so are not valid.

I intend to change the citation to one at Physics Essays, which I hope is more acceptable, and to rewrite some of the proposed text. I guess this a case of using the Sandbox to discuss my changes. For that purpose I will shortly make use of the sandbox to show my proposed changes for discussion purposes.

The latest uncivil, offensive comment from an IP address is surely from a person with a POV problem and should not have been published, in my opinion. Should it be reported to someone or somewhere at Wiki?

    Relativityman (talk) 00:06, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the comment violates the policy of Civility and is unacceptable. Have a look at Dealing with incivility. RockMagnetist (talk) 01:41, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As for the reasons for reverting your edits, not much effort has gone into the edit summaries because some of your comments are obviously wrong and contradict the body of the article. For example, Physical constant#Dimensional and dimensionless physical constants gives examples of dimensionless constants (how can you argue that the ratio of two masses has a physical dimension?); and the title of Physical constant#How constant are the physical constants? is self-explanatory. Before making any more edits, you should read these sections carefully. If you think some of the information is wrong, you should consider editing those sections. Don't start with the lead, which is supposed to be a summary of the article (see Manual of Style/Lead section). RockMagnetist (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indent[edit]

I notice the indent feature with :::: colons doesn't work.
 Relativityman (talk) 23:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me. RockMagnetist (talk) 14:41, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relativityman, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Relativityman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Natural Relativity[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Natural Relativity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jinkinson talk to me 17:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Natural Relativity (June 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FireflySixtySeven (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question about User_talk:Relativityman[edit]

Hello, Relativityman! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about User_talk:Relativityman. You can read the reply at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#14:35:04, 29 June 2014 review of submission by Relativityman. Fiddle Faddle 14:54, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Natural Relativity (July 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 19 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Draft:Natural Relativity page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Natural Relativity[edit]

Draft:Natural Relativity, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Natural Relativity and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Natural Relativity during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Natural Relativity (July 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:37, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]