User talk:Rettstatt

Monk Ashland, et al[edit]

Greetings, Mr Rettstatt. I noticed that you have created three articles, Monk Ashland, The Sky Village and Kaimira, and that you have a close connection with the subjects!! Wikipedia strongly advises editors not to create or edit such articles with which they have a close connection per WP:COI. However, these seem to have been created in good faith and I would only suggest that that you refrain from any further editing of them (apart from typos and the like). Regards. --Malcolmxl5 04:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information, Malcolm, and the link to the specific section of the guidelines. I've been careful to keep these three entries objective and informational, and I'll take your suggestion and let the larger Wikipedia community take it from here.

 -- Rettstatt (talk) 14:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monk Ashland for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monk Ashland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monk Ashland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GermanJoe (talk) 08:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Sky Village[edit]

The article The Sky Village has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Book that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. No valid sources are present in the article. Searches only brought up one short review in Kirkus Reviews, which is not enough to pass WP:NBOOK alone. Article appears to have been originally created by the author of the book.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 02:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]