User talk:Rheadiya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ভাইয়া আমি আপনার সাথে কথা বলতে চাই । — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deep Ronjon Das (talk • contribs) 12:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Economy of India has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Economy of India has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Economy of India has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thomas.W talk 17:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Electronics and semiconductor manufacturing industry in India[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Electronics and semiconductor manufacturing industry in India, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 03:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electronics and semiconductor manufacturing industry in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fab. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electronics and semiconductor manufacturing industry in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ARM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Surgical strikes, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Surgical strike. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. — MBlaze Lightning T 04:13, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Rheadiya. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing[edit]

Hi! Thanks for your contribution to the article West Bengal and Economy of West Bengal. Updates were really needed in those. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:06, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Thank you for your kind appreciation and cooperation! Regards. Rheadiya (talk) 19:21, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WB FARC Comment[edit]

Hi! Do you have time to help out in West Bengal article? Please see the above link to understand the concerns. Thanks,--Dwaipayan (talk) 13:43, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Notable Historical Places in Murshidabad[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Notable Historical Places in Murshidabad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Rheadiya. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Rheadiya. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravish Kumar, you may be blocked from editing. — hako9 (talk) 04:16, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please elaborate with minute details, references and evidences as to what exactly you found in my editing that comes within the definition of disruptive editing and vandalization. If I am blocked from editing, I might intereprete the block as infringement of my right as an editor to keep a page neutral and politically unbiased as per the official guidelines of the publisher as well as severe violation sovereign law of the land under which the publishing mass platform is permitted to exhibit their content within jurisdictions of respective countries that hold the international platform, a foreign entity in those sovereign territories, responsible for maintaining highest standards of scholarly neutrality in covering all sides of the content with full fairness and ensure no intentions of meddling in internal political discourse that would be otherwise carried out by only allowing links of certain media reports as reference to curate a biased polotical narrative while shadow-banning and excising links of other media reports as reference for not conforming to that particular politically biased narrative and hence I might contemplate taking legal recourse in my defense and protection of my right as an editor I believe I have dicharged with utmost honesty to the best of my knowledge. Rheadiya (talk) 01:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You added an unverifiable and over the top, editorialised statement with vague implications. — hako9 (talk) 05:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just softly contextualised (by adding quotation marks instead of outrightly deleting or countering with arguments and opinions available on the other side of the political spectrum), an over the top unverifiable (means not scientifically evidenced, not proven to be true in any court of law) politically tilted editorialised oponion (of certain section of academics, political opponents of a certain political party and certain activists who themselves call themselves leftists with innumerable evidences strewn across public fora- not vague implications- reflecting their opinions through socalled reports in certain news media in both India and abroad, The Guardian, linked in the Wikipedia article, that often quote and refer each other and also often refer to news content generated from the said news media, NDTV as primary source of their news related to India, forming a citation loop and hence remain heavily compromised because of conflict of interest when it comes to politically unbiased reportage on the said topic), when describing the takeover as "hostile" and certain industrialist as "close ally" of certain political party and certain politician. This way Wikipedia, a non profit organisation that has humble and holistic goal of spreading knowledge, for which it while exhibiting its content in other sovereign countries as a foreign entity (as part of Wikimedia Foundations headquartered in the USA) has to abide by laws of the land in those countries including that of not interefering and meddling in domestic political discourse of those countries, is being dragged into a spot by vested interests with political affiliation by weaponising the reputation and capability of dissemination of information of this mass platform to further a certain kind of highly opinionated political narrative of certain groups, individuals, academics and political parties in a certain country by creating a citation loop with impunity, linking only those media reports of mediahouses that align ideologically or out of common interests while shadow banning and excising reference links of other media houses that do not necessarily conform to thatvparticular narrative and offer countering views in their reports, in order to portray their narrative as the only established, mainstream fact and general public perception and it is anybody's guess that political interests often indulge in such activities with electoral dividends in sight. The right to edit this article has been appropriated is being closely guarded by certain editors like you (as though it is your private property) and you are evidently touchy to even quotation marks used just to contextualise that reference to news report on opinion or perception of a section of people (no matter how rich or influential or popular they are or how noted they are as academics, intellectuals and activists- political commentary on political events is grey area and one should tread with caution when making encyclopedic content on recent and dynamic political events) does not make it scientifically evidenced truth or fact, "verified" for that matter or indisputable verdict of the court of law or general perception of all the people in a society and hence you do not let any editor you are not comfortable with to edit out of your fear that the political agenda agenda may be lost which is why you label ostentatious charges of disruptive editing and vandalisation to discourage any attempt of neutral encyclopedic documentation with threat of block with you misusing your power as senior editor. Let me remind you that Wikipedia guidelines are public and it has to abide by laws of the land while making its content available in sovereign territories that it is not immune to which is why any illegal misuse of power, threat and illegal conflict of interest (as in mass platform meant for dissemination of knowledge being used as a political tool to further particular polotical narrative) carries legal ramification and if I am blocked, I shall contemplate seeking legal redressal in my defence and for protection of my legal rights seeking my reinstatement and compensation from both the wrongdoing individual or group of individuals as well as from the platform that employs them. Rheadiya (talk) 07:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blaise Pascal once said, "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time". I'd have read your diatribe, if I had the time too. You can take comfort in the fact the it will not be me, if ever you are blocked. You can make a case to an uninvolved admin. Till that time, be succinct and take your issue to the article talk page. — hako9 (talk) 07:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

People often quote by dropping big names to deflect. Ofcourse lack of your time is evident given the preoccupation you have, that of appropriating editorial rights of other editors on certain articles you need to "protect" out of your interests that lie beyond the official goals of the mass platform. "It will be not me"- that is precisely why I mentioned "group of individuals" as I know such admins' racket with political agenda and vested interests operate in groups. "Be succinct", thanks but I can not help it as mischiefs hiding behind perfunctory formality and grey area of ethics need elaborate and well articulated repertoire. I had no issues till you came to my porch to lecture me brusquely with patently incongruous charges of disruptive editing and vandalising and threaten me of blocking. You could just carry on with your appropriation of others' editorial rights on that article page without notifying me. Advice for an advice, do grow some fortitude once you are done with reading blurbs, banners and hoardings; I get though that it must be in short supply when fighting the immoral fight. Obviously you have no time given the way you were so prompt in reverting edits on that page. I shall think about Whatever I need to do on this platform and beyond the purview of this platform to stop unintended and unethical weaponisation of grand goals and scope of this wonderful platform. Rheadiya (talk) 09:04, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rheadiya&oldid=1141047212"