User talk:Rickybenz90

Hi Rickybenz90! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 15:30, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Used discography has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Used discography was changed by Rickybenz90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2019-06-03T03:33:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Live from Maida Vale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Live from Maida Vale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live from Maida Vale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richard3120 (talk) 23:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Interwined

Hello! I reverted your revert of my edit. "Interwined" is not a word, unless you have a special definition for it? ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:38, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Used, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:12, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on The Used. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A personal website of yours does not qualify Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:00, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

See [[:WP:PRIMARY and WP:SECONDARY. Please find the latter. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:38, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Future albums

Please hold off on adding articles for future albums until there is more than just a track listing and a few singles. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

I put a ton of info on their. more then just track list and singles. please do not delete it again when I had 5 sources.

You put a ton of unrelated info on there, but it's all from one source, a blog from bringthenoise.com, which is not a reliable source. There are primary sources linking to video singles and https://www.kerrang.com/features/bert-mccracken-and-the-future-of-the-used-we-recorded-26-or-27-songs-that-we-love/ doesn't actually even mention "heartwork" so I'm not sure what it's being used to source. The Apple Music source shows the song titles, but so does the blog and so does https://www.kerrang.com/the-news/the-used-have-announced-their-new-album-heartwork/.

None of it is gone, and it can all be restored when more reliable sources become available, but for now, there's not enough info to meet WP:NALBUM. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

the bring the noise site I just looked at quick and thought it was the big noise site which is the record label, my bad. but all the other sites are legit and you can go to their official site theused.net too and see it all. there is no reason for the page to not exist, that's still 4 reliable sources. and plenty more by a simple google search so if your such a expert wikipediaer, instead of deleted my hours of work why don't you google it and add more sources and improve the page instead of removing it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rickybenz90 (talk • contribs) 06:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

While the other sites are "legit", they don't help the album to meet WP:NALBUM. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

No GNG has still not been met. All of the mentions are either passing or WP:ROUTINE. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

then correct it instead of removing it so I don't have to report you for vandalizing the page. thanks.

February 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Heartwork (The Used album); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You are mistaken. I am not vandalizing the article, I am correctly apply guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Heartwork (The Used album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heartwork (The Used album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartwork (The Used album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Used, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Stop removing the {{primary source inline}} tags and this ends. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:46, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)