User talk:Righanred

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Righanred, good luck, and have fun. Vengeance 01 (talk) 15:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Ludwig Ahgren. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludwig Ahgren (July 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Primefac were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

On the surface, this looks to be a well-sourced draft, but when you start looking at the actual references used, it's little more than a WP:OVERCITE bordering on WP:BOMBARDMENT. Half the refs do little more than verify facts, and there are way too many references that aren't about Ahgren (for example, we don't need three refs that verify the identity of a different player and don't even mention Ahgren). The "best" ref of the group is the TechSpot article, and even then it's not huge on the "depth of coverage". In other words, ditch the play-by-play of his life career, summarize the important details of his life (major wins, sponsoring a tournament, etc), cut down on the number of references that don't even mention him (ideally to 0), and please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ludwig Ahgren and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ludwig Ahgren, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mizkif draft[edit]

Hi there.

I stumbled upon your Mizkif userpage draft after finding a picture of him on Wikimedia Commons and wanted to share with you that I created an actual draft page at Draft:Mizkif. Keep in mind however that the page isn't quite ready to be published until we find reliable sources documenting his early life + early twitch career, so if you happen to find any sources documenting that, please don't hesitate to add them. Thanks. Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 06:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Ludwig Ahgren. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 01:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Picture for Brock Lesnar’s Wikipedia page[edit]

Hello

I saw you were changing the Wiki pictures for a lot of Pro Wrestlers in their pages

I don’t know how to do that because of copyrights rules,I don’t really understand it yet,but you seem as an expert

I don’t know what’s the thing with pictures on Wikipedia profiles but can you choose a better picture that looks cool for a legend like brock lesnar?

I will appreciate it. Andrewnageh123 (talk) 19:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Sanders[edit]

Please do not engage in edit wars on Sarah Sanders. We came to a consensus regarding the image on the talk page. Michael-Moates (talk) 06:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis Hamilton[edit]

The Lewis Hamilton image you added appears to be a copyright violation, which is why it was reverted. You can learn more at WP:IUP. IronManCap (talk) 16:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide edit summaries.[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Ludwig Ahgren does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --Pilaz (talk) 20:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mitch Jones (streamer)[edit]

Hello, Righanred. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mitch Jones (streamer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mitch Jones (streamer)[edit]

Hello, Righanred. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mitch Jones".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Geowizard[edit]

Thanks for this edit, Righanred. I was going to make this addition today too, having watched the video last night, but you beat me to it! MIDI (talk) 08:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glover Teixeira[edit]

Were you having a laugh when you made this edit? It's really inexcusable with the only exception being a good laugh. --SVTCobra 18:36, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom Request Notification[edit]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Jonathunder's use of admin tools in content disputes and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 08:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Motions have been proposed at the case request Jonathunder's use of admin tools in content disputes[edit]

Several motions have been proposed at the Jonathunder's use of admin tools in content disputes case request which you are a party to. You can view them here. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 00:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

You appear to be changing established images on several Wiki articles without proper consensus on articles such as The Undertaker, Charles Robinson, Chyna, Brock Lesnar, Chris Jericho and Seth Rollins. If you want to change such established contents please seen WP:RfC from other editors, if you continue to engage in this disruptive behavior you will be warned 3 times, then reported then blocked! Dilbaggg (talk) 04:46, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dilbaggg: Yo Dilbaggg, just wanted to respond to your message. You mentioned that I was changing established images, which I did for The Undertaker and Chyna. Perhaps I should have took to the Talk page of those articles before I made those switches. If you felt like all of my edits were disruptive why didn't you revert back my Charles Robinson (referee) lead image change? Additionally, my changes to Brock Lesnar and Dominik Mysterio were constructive. Per MOS:CITIZEN, Dominik should be labled "American" and Lesnar should be labeled as "American-Canadian" (see reference 343 on the Brock Lesnar page). I certainly would not consider my behavior to be "disruptive". If you still disagree, feel free to reach out. Righanred (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]