User talk:River19

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jonathan Djanogly, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.—GrahamSmith (talk) 17:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Now, I'm probably not expressing myself as well as I might, and I'm not seeking to offend, but start a genuine discussion with the intention of improving the article about Jonathan Djanogly, but may I please draw your attention to WP:EW?
Sir, it is a real pain having to reinstate properly referenced stuff about Jonathan Djanogly MP that has appeared in the national press after you keep deleting it. Given that you appear never to have edited anything other than Jonathan Djanogly and that your edits appear mainly to remove matters of public interest that might be seen as damaging to Mr Djanogly, might I please ask you to state your connection with Mr Djanogly on the article's talk page? For the record, I have no connection with the gentleman, and am simply interested in Wikipedia present a true, honest, complete and factual account of the man as derived from national press and similar reputable sources.—GrahamSmith (talk) 18:16, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stivian for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. DuncanHill (talk) 14:52, 11 September 2011 (UTC)