User talk:Rossdanielbarrie/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer Review[edit]

Starts off great. Uses clear and relevant statistics. Could improve by citing sources as you go. Clearly relates to your topic and country. Bwiffen1234 (talk) 22:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ruben's peer review[edit]

  • Really good structure, as good as a paragraph from an advanced editor
  • Every point is structured out well but not too detailed
  • Due to numbers and neutral way of writing really informal
  • Sources are all reliable

Overall good work, keep it going like this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RubenGer (talkcontribs) 23:12, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]