User talk:SAM191

January 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Orphan Wiki. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Pony Express— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Orphan Wiki 00:12, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pony Express. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pony Express was changed by SAM191 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856337 on 2017-01-13T00:13:50+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Pony Express. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 00:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SAM191, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi SAM191! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pony Express has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pony Express was changed by SAM191 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877692 on 2017-02-08T23:24:56+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning for disruptive editing: do not re-insert anything about Johnny Fry without support from excellent sources. If you will read the article you will see that Fry is named as one of two men who may have been the first rider, giving references to several published accounts: Noyster (talk), 10:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, SAM191. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 13:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Smith's Creek Station[edit]

Hello, SAM191. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Smith's Creek Station, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:19, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Hello SAM191 -- I reverted your recent unsourced edits to John Wycliffe. The claims you mention date to prior to the 1415 date of the preceding sentence. Well before Wylcif's death, all his principal clerical followers had recanted. Seizure of property was not part of the Church's procedure with clerical heresy; such followers of Wyclif's ideas as persisted after 1401 were subject to burning at the stake under the act De heretico comburendo, but again this precedes the 1415 date. As mentioned elsewhere in the article, Wyclif was posthumously burned at the stake in 1428. Clevelander96 (talk) 22:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Evolution.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Black Kite (talk) 00:30, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 10:05, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]