User talk:SNIyer12/Archive 3
Stop editing the various Legend of Zelda pages to say that the Zelda Link saves in Zelda II had a red rose in her hand. You are attempting to draw a parallel with Briar Rose which DOES NOT EXIST. There is NO canon source with images or text supporting the red rose( or the "100 years", for that matter). If I'm wrong then CITE your source in your edit summaries or on talk pages. Your repeated inclusion of this irrelevant and unsupported information is vandalism. -- WikidSmaht (talk) 05:53, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Since you persist in putting this bullshit in the articles with no supporting reference, I am going to take this to RfC or directly to an admin, after I examin current policy and determine the appropriate course of action. -- WikidSmaht (talk) 04:59, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Mumbai edits[edit]
Hi! I have reverted your recent edits to the Mumbai article. The article is a featured article and all style considerations have already been taken care of. The moving up of the images results in the messing up of the text in lower resolutions. Also, avoid unnecessarily sectioning (the radio stations part). Thanks and regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:37, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop moving the images in the Mumbai article. As I've said, it messes the formatting in 800x600 resolution. Please desist from doing so in the future. It may be considered vandalism. Thanks =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit]
 |
Links for Wikipedians interested in India content |
|
|
Newcomers: Welcome kit |
Register: Indian Wikipedians |
Network: Noticeboard (WP:INWNB)
Browse: India | Open tasks |
Deletions
| ||
Hi, couldn't see these links in your archive, so I thought I'll add them here, just in case you do not know of them. --Gurubrahma 12:45, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
This page needs to be replaced with the disambig it was originally, It cannot simply rediret to the Canadian org. I've asked an admin to do so. Thanks/wangi 23:49, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, things were looking confusing to me too when editing - regardless the term cannot simply redirect to Department of National Defence (Canada) since some of the other terms are well known too. Thanks/wangi 23:53, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
Incomplete merge process[edit]
You removed the merge notices on List of television show casting changes and Same Character, Different Actor without actually doing any merging. The purpose of adding the merge notices is not only to ensure community consensus, but also to allow someone with subject-matter expertise to update the page contents so that no information is lost. The process for merging is documented Wikipedia:Merging_and_moving_pages#Performing_the_merger. I have attempted to haphazardly transfering the old content, but had to leave most of the show refences in a new "unclassified" section. -- Bovineone 06:51, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Fox News Channel[edit]
Thanks for fixing my improper revert. Trödel•talk 00:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Transportation in NYC[edit]
Hello SNlyer - I noticed your work on the New York City Subway article. You might be interested in the Transportation in New York City sub article. It tells a fascinating story and it's been nominated to be a US Collaboration of the Week after lots of work over the last few weeks. Check it out and if you like it, please vote for it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:USCOTW We need all the votes we can get! Wv235 04:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
I have started a poll on using full party names or short forms on this template. Please vote at Talk:Canadian federal election, 2006. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 23:39, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
US Collaboration of the week[edit]
You have voted for Transportation in New York City on WP:USCOTW. It was selected to be this week's winner. You are invited to contribute to improve Transportation in New York City in any way you can. Cmadler 13:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
As WikidSmaht said, there is no parallel beween Zelda II and Briar Rose, and your editing is not only misleading, but downright stubborn and obstreporous. I have now been responsible for reverting 2 of these misleading edits, and have seen no source, including the Zelda II manual, to suggest otherwise. Please bear in mind that if this occurs again without citation of a valid source, WikidSmaht and I may be forced to construct an RfC against you. This is your last warning. Setokaiba✌≝ 18:53, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Has there been talkpage discussion / consensus on the Hillary Rodham Clinton page RE: whether Bill should be referred to as President or Former President?
Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 01:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
- Whoops, think I misread an edit history. Feel free to ignore the question unless you do happen to know the answer. In which case, I'd love to know :)
- Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 01:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi, hope you don't mind, but I reverted your recent edit here because you removed all the previous contents of the talk page after archiving, including ongoing discussions. Please add your edit again but don't remove recent edits. --Tony Sidaway 20:15, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I was just curious about this edit, and wanted to talk to you instead of just reverting it. Did you feel that the information about Vancouver was unnecessary, or was there some other reason? Thanks in advance for your response! EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 03:21, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
P.S.- In the future, you can avoid confusions and questions like this by providing an edit summary.
- Thanks for your response. I figured that was the case, but wanted to make sure from you. Thanks for your edits! EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 17:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Archiving Winter Olympics Talk Page[edit]
Could you explain why? The page isn't that long and it's a current event, so some of the discussions are relevant. Sue Anne 17:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. Seems a bit unecessary. Crunch 11:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- It was mistake to archive, but we all make mistakes sometimes :). I have reversed the archive - we will archive after the games are over. More importantly: You must use edit summaries, particulary when archiving. It's very important.--Commander Keane 11:41, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
He actually is the ottawa bureau chief. I wont change it yet, but i know he is.Theonlyedge 01:02, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
I've tagged many images in that article as having no source. These images need to have a link to the website containing the original image, otherwise their source cannot be verified. Thanks. --tomf688{talk} 01:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging for Image:PresidentsWatchReaganCasketCarriedIntoCathedral.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:PresidentsWatchReaganCasketCarriedIntoCathedral.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.
If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 11:16, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Question re: State funeral article[edit]
I noted that you were one of the more frequent and seemingly more informed contributors with respect to the State funeral article. I posted some questions concerning the Canadian situation in the talk page for that article (under the heading "Canadian Situation", and I would appreciate if you could review and consider my questions. Thanks.
- Thanks for your answer on the Talk page. Can you provide a source for a policy on this? I'd appreciate having a reference. I'm not challenging your assertion, I would just like to review the primary source.
Request for edit summary[edit]
Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 13% for major edits and 21% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.)
This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 16:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Closings and cancellations following the September 11, 2001 attacks[edit]
Greetings. I have reverted the edits you have made to the 'cancellations' section of Closings and cancellations following the September 11, 2001 attacks. Please do not simply add the changes back before a discussion on its talk page. I placed a comment there on this subject on January 28, have seen no response or rationale, and at least one anonymous user who is not me has reverted the changes made on the grounds that the edits embody POV editing. Please review the article Neutral Point of View fully before responding on the article's talk page. Skybunny 21:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC)