User talk:SNIyer12/Archive 9

2009 Stanley Cup Finals[edit]

Probably not good to undo edits from established users without any comment at all. Anyhow, we discussed this some time ago at WT:HOCKEY and decided that for visibility, the main navboxes for some related articles should be outside of the navbox group. If you've got a reason to make an exception here, I'm open to hear and discuss it. I noted in the edit summary that the "majority" use this format - that is of course not really accurate. Many do, however. Regards, Rjd0060 (talk) 01:08, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You ignore my note and continue to do it? This is highly inappropriate. There have been a few discussions about this, the most recent being here. If you don't like it, start a discussion and stop reverting. - Rjd0060 (talk) 21:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SNIyer12, I'd like to talk with you about your most recent edits to the article, and about a potential collaboration. Can we please speak on the talk page there? As it happens, I just created a section today that might interest you. –ConkblockCity (talk) 20:25, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rapid changes to the Stanley Cup Finals broadcasters article[edit]

I would advice you to not propose such considerably radical alterations, without given a more proper or thorough rationale rather than "well, they've already been linked once!" When I first looked at the new look of the article, there was no clear explaination given. TMC1982 (talk) 06:33 p.m., 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Multiple AfD's[edit]

While I do feel somewhat bad mentioning and bringing two of these nominations, three of your recent articles are now up for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of arenas to host NBA Finals and Stanley Cup Finals in the same year and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knicks–Rangers Finals series of 1994 and comment if you so desire. Cheers, Reso lute 23:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have redirected the knicks rangers final article per the results of the afd discussion. Also since no afd debate occured for the bulls blackhawks article i have nominated this at afd. please comment if you like, and happy editing. Ottawa4ever (talk) 13:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sports-related curses[edit]

Please don't remove links to an article whose deletion is only proposed, as you've been doing for Sports-related curses. =) Thanks! Powers ^T 13:59, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Please summarize your changes -- you often make many changes in rapid sequence, and it's difficult to understand what, or why, the changes are being made. Thank you. Sme3 (talk) 12:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Barack Obama. Thank you. I concur with the above statement. Please summarize your edits and don't make them rapid-fire if they are disruptive to format or content. DKqwerty (talk) 01:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barack Obama, you will be blocked from editing. DKqwerty (talk) 22:32, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sports articles[edit]

Hiya SNIyes12. You seem to be adding things & reverting things, while not discussing them with others. Why is this? GoodDay (talk) 14:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to respond at Wikipedia: WikiProject Ice Hockey, as there's editors there, who are concerned about your editing habits & apparent lack of comunicating with others -- Thus lack of collaboration. GoodDay (talk) 15:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There can be only 3 explanations for your continued habits. 1) Somehow, you're not getting the famous 'orange bar' that informs you of incoming posts at your Userpage, 2) You're simply ignoring it, or 3) You're simply not noticing it (which is hard to believe with a 4-year established editor). GoodDay (talk) 23:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reported to Wikipedia:Administrator's noticeboard/Incidents[edit]

I think it's time an administrator ~~block~~ talk with you. It's quite apparent that you don't believe in the collaboration side of Wikipedia. GoodDay (talk) 16:16, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've reported you to the ANI, for your un-cooperative & un-communicative style. GoodDay (talk) 16:33, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See the ANI report on yourself. You may respond there & defend your actions, we won't BITE. GoodDay (talk) 20:31, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

talking about edits[edit]

Sometimes, it helps to talk about edits. Is there any reason you haven't talked about your edits when asked to do so, or left edit summaries? Gwen Gale (talk) 17:35, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've edited since I left this post. Is there any reason you don't want to answer me? Gwen Gale (talk) 18:48, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for now using edit summaries. Please do so on all edits from now on and if you cannot, please let me know why you cannot. If an editor posts here on your talk page in good faith, please answer them. If you cannot answer them, please let me know why you cannot. Cheers, Gwen Gale (talk) 19:34, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please participate at discussion on article talkpages, where your edits are questioned. GoodDay (talk) 19:44, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continued editing with no communication or explanation attempts despite multi-editor concern, both here and on WP:ANI. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan | 39 20:32, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now that your block has expired, I hope you'll be more considerate (by responding) when next time somebody tries to get in contact with you. It helps things alot, if you do not snub others. GoodDay (talk) 23:09, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:State funeral of John F. Kennedy[edit]

I saw you were trying to archive this page. You made a couple of mistakes (archives should be at [[Talk:ArticleName/Archive_#]]). Anyway, I fixed it all now, so should be fine (have a look at what I did if you're interested). If you have a question about anything, go ahead and ask me. Cheers :) - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 00:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You mean restructure State funeral of John F. Kennedy? I'm too tired at the moment I'm afraid, and I'm not the best person to do it anyway. The best way to bring attention to the fact that the page needs maintenance is to place {{Clean-up}} on the page, or a similar template. Cheers - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 00:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]