User talk:Sabuell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Sabuell! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! RP459 (talk) 04:10, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Translation question[edit]

We have an article on the Japanese Aero Engines Corporation (JAEC), with a plural "Engines" in the title. Howerver, the IAE website list it as "Japanese Aero Engine Corporation", with a singular "Engine". Unfortunately, the JAEC website is in Japanese only. Do you know which is correct? Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 11:17, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because the competent governmental authority (主務官庁) said Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (経済産業省), I searched the prefecture ministry, but there was not the hit of the English name. The plural form of the noun is not important in the Japanese. And "エンジン" is "engine". However, they say that it is "engines". --Sabuell (talk) 05:46, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Who is the "they" in "they say that it is 'engines'."? My printed source, World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines, 5th Edition by Bill Gunston, and FlightGlobal both use the singular form. Since that is how it appears in English sources, I'm inclined to move the page to Japanese Aero Engine Corporation so our reader will find the company at the name they expect. - BilCat (talk) 06:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why is there much notation of the singular form? I do not understand the reason. Since BilCat has the source of information, I think that the movement does not have any problem. --Sabuell (talk) 14:25, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice KC-767 photo[edit]

ja:ファイル:KC-767J.jpg is a nice aerial photo, but it's not on Commons, as far as I can tell. Can you look at the file page, and see if you can tell if it can be moved to Commons? Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 15:35, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I done. notified to pertinent user. see commons:File:The KC-767J of 404th Squadron.jpg.--Sabuell (talk) 18:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!- BilCat (talk) 07:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kawasaki OH-1 Ninja?[edit]

Is "Ninja" an official name for the Kawasaki OH-1? If so, a good source, even if it's in Japanese, would be useful, and I could then move the article to Kawasaki OH-1 Ninja. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 20:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Japanese warplane is named by Defense Ministry. According to the document (sample), it was written as an Observation helicopter (OH-1) (観測ヘリコプター (OH-1)). However, in another page, Ninja (ニンジャ) is written as a popular name (nickname). Both are sites of the Defense Ministry, but Im hard to regard Ninja as the official name. Because it is only observation helicopter and OH-1 to be common in the page of a budget demand and the equipment introduction.--Sabuell (talk) 06:48, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]