User talk:Sarthakpatel.in

ANI Notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

IJEDR[edit]

I've trimmed the blatently delete-worthy stuff, and what's left ought to be a decent start. From here on, you may wish to look at how other journal articles are written and see what you use in your article. Dralwi k|^{Have a Chat} 06:17, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, Sarthakpatel.in. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article International Journal of Engineering Development and Research, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Sarthakpatel.in/sandbox (April 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sarthakpatel.in/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 13:53, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from International Journal of Engineering Development and Research, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 03:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 03:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As long as the deletion debate is in progress, the deletion notice may not be removed from the article. In a couple of days, an administrator will close the debate; if there is consensus to delete the article, he will do so; otherwise, the notice will be removed. Feel free to contribute to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Journal of Engineering Development and Research instead; note that everybody who joined the debate so far has voted to delete the page. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 03:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruption, and continual removal of deletion discussion tags. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. the panda ₯’ 08:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As your username violates our username policy, I have extended this unblock to indefinite. Please note: this block applies to YOU, the person. You personally may not edit Wikipedia until this block has been dealt with. This means that you may NOT create a new userid, nor may you edit anonymously. Any unblock request must a) address the disruptive behaviour you have been engaged in, b) shows signs that you understand that you may not promote yourself or another entity, and c) use the {{unblock-spamun|new requested username}} format. See WP:GAB and WP:AAB prior to any such request. You would do well to personally review if your desire to edit Wikipedia matches Wikipedia's reasons for existence as well the panda ₯’ 09:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]