User talk:Satxjoe

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Satxjoe, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Opuntia alta, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! PamD 08:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Opuntia alta[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Opuntia alta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.opuntiads.com/opuntia-alta-2/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PamD 08:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Opuntia anahuacensis[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Opuntia anahuacensis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.opuntiads.com/opuntia-anahuacensis/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PamD 08:53, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Writing articles - lead sentence[edit]

As well as avoiding copyright violations, please also remember to start each article with a "lead sentence" which explains what the topic is. A typical Wikipedia article starts with "Topic is ...", such as "Opuntia anahuacensis is a cactus species in the Opuntia genus." This is the sentence someone sees if they hover over a link to the article, or if they find it as a Google search: it needs to put the title into context, and not every reader knows whether "Opuntia" is a tree, a pondweed, or something in between. PamD 18:15, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Writing articles - sources[edit]

Thanks for adding a lead sentence to the new version of Opuntia alta, and please remember to do so for your article creations in future.

I've upgraded your reference - it's a journal article, so needs to be formatted to show the author, title, etc, not just the journal in which it appeared.

But I can't find the facts you cite in that article - for example it says that the plants can grow "2 1/2 to 3 1/2 meters high in large specimens" but you state "some older specimens forming trees to 15 feet (4.6 m) tall" (that's after I added the "convert" template to make the height more widely understood - see WP:MOSNUM). Where does your height come from? I imagine it's from https://www.opuntiads.com/opuntia-alta-2/, so cite that. References are supposed to show where content has come from. Both these sources seem useful, so include them both.

There's a lot to learn about Wikipedia, starting with not using other people's words but writing it yourself, but it's an interesting journey - Happy Editing! PamD 22:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Units of measurement[edit]

On reading WP:MOSNUM again myself, specifically WP:UNITS, I find that for any article on a scientific topic - eg botany - the SI units should be used, but "Generally, conversions to and from metric units and US or imperial units should be provided" (MOS:CONVERSIONS) The units you state should be as in the source, but the {{convert}} template will convert; if the source is in non-SI units you can use "order=flip" to display the value converted to SI first. I'll fix this one. PamD 23:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Opuntia rufida) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Opuntia rufida, Satxjoe!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add your sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Opuntia aurea) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Opuntia aurea, Satxjoe!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please add your sources?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:07, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Opuntia lindheimeri) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Opuntia lindheimeri, Satxjoe!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please see WP:INLINECITE

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Satxjoe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Satxjoe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]