User talk:Sbad61

June 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Felida97. I noticed that you recently removed content from Prime (drink) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 19:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is automated, but I made a simple edit mistake, apologies Sbad61 (talk) 19:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why so aggressive?[edit]

Heya.

You insulted me for "telling you what photo to use" on the Prime page. I was only saying that one photo should be used because if both were used, then one would be near the Prime Energy section, despite showing Prime Hydration. Chameleon Gamer 12:47, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant the Advertising section, not Prime Energy section. Chameleon Gamer 12:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay man, just, please.dont do it again Sbad61 (talk) 13:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Next Senedd election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ynys Môn. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User page edit[edit]

Could you please explain this edit?-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:58, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My old Wikipedia page Sbad61 (talk) 16:01, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not your "old" Wikipedia page; if it is your account, you've been using both of these accounts concurrently without disclosing the relationship between the accounts. In addition, you edited with this account while you're Shezfrez62 account was blocked between July 6th and 13th. This is a blatant violation of WP:SOCK.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was my old account, it's now my friend account, I used this one after I stopped using ShezFrez. Thank you Sbad61 (talk) 11:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked your accounts for abuse of multiple accounts. You've used both of your accounts to edit the same articles without declaring a connection and also used this account to evade the block of Shezfrez62. In addition, if it is true that you have provided access to your Shezfrez62 account, that account is now compromised and cannot be unblocked. Account sharing is not allowed on Wikipedia.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Next Thai general election moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Next Thai general election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DIV IN E 10:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Hi Sbad61! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Paul McLennan several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Paul McLennan, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. A formal photo of the politician is more appropriate for the infobox here.. Belbury (talk) 17:51, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Shezfrez62 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shezfrez62. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 22:33, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Next Thai general election for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Thai general election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Thai general election (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]