Thanks for uploading Image:4150.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Image tagging for Image:Cover_2003_ofwindandweeping.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Cover_2003_ofwindandweeping.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mirrorthrone and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mirrorthrone with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mirrorthrone.
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. MichaelGreiner 03:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Please stop editing the genre of Amon Amarth to your personal likings, and refer to the talk page instead where that issue is discussed. ~ | twsx | talkcont | 05:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do not revert genre edits, please. I've edited the genres according to WP:ALBUM#Genre, do not violate (and you've also violated the 3 reverts policy). --MagnoliaPenn 03:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. 142.167.69.56 07:06, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. 142.167.69.56 07:06, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 142.167.69.56 07:06, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please discuss changes to genres on the appropriate Talk pages rather than reverting endlessly. Please see Wikipedia:Edit war for more information. Wyatt Riot 21:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop engaging in edit wars regarding genres. Since the edits are disputed, the only option at this point is to build consensus on each article's Talk page. If this continues, I'll have no choice but to bring this up at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct. Wyatt Riot 01:34, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Mirrorthrone, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Mirrorthrone satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirrorthrone and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Mirrorthrone during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. MichaelGreiner 23:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
With regards to your comments on User talk:156.34.228.63: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. John254 02:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. 216.21.150.44 03:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Warning for violating Wikipedia policy WP:EL[edit]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 142.166.234.70 15:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop editing warring on Biohazard (band), Wintersun and Hypocrisy (band). If you continue you will be blocked from editing. The same goes for the dynamic IP at the other side of the edit war - I have no problem with blocking all of his/her IPs but the edit warring must stop. WjBscribe 17:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edits show that you are continuing to edit war across multiple articles - please discuss disputed edits rather than blanket reverting. If this pattern of edit warring resumes (even without a clear breach of the three revert rule on a particular article) you will be blocked from editing. This is likely to be the last warning you will receive. WjBscribe 21:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Twsx and Dear Scipo, May I remind you both not to get into an edit war, it's only a comma!!
Please both of you Have a Nice cup of Tea and Sit Down
The guidelines on the template page do not specify, however in the example on the template page shows the genres to be separated by commas and are all on the same line. PhilB ~ T/C 20:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Amateur fansites are not references, they are spam. Read WP:RS to find out what passes for reliable sources... because rockdetector and metal-archives and all other amateur webzines certainly do not.
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 156.34.232.134 01:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank for the warning but I disagree with your conclusion. Just beacause you think Rock Dectector is a "amateur webzines" as you put it, Does not give you the right to remove. The fact that you have been stalking me for a while does not lend credability to your agrument. Also, I would point out that you restored a link to the same page on the opeth article Scipo 00:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.
I will also warn you that blanking warnings and ongoing converstions from your talk page is considered vandalism on Wikipedia. If you continue to edit war without discussing issues and waiting for concensus then a Wikipedia administrator will be alerted to your ignorance of Wikipedia Policy and you will be blocked from editing this project. 216.21.150.44 04:09, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:45, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Heavy metal music, you will be blocked from editing. —DCGeist 23:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
