User talk:Sdfakjdfjklklasdf

Sdfakjdfjklklasdf, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Sdfakjdfjklklasdf! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:FREEAGENTShq.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:FREEAGENTShq.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Invasionmtv.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Invasionmtv.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Invasopen.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Invasopen.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 03:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm XboxGamer22408. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Baywatch (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. XboxGamer22408^{talk to me} 18:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You[edit]

I'm just happy that you tracked down Realitytvshow and its puppet. Didn't know anything about it at first until now. Unicornaholic243 (talk) 19:07, 15 June 2017 (UTC) Sdfakjdfjklklasdf (talk)no problem. It's not their only puppet and I assume they'll be back.[reply]

And if they do, I know that it'll be done the same person doing it. Unicornaholic243 (talk) 06:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fletcher on Challenge[edit]

Reason why I feel there is no reason to put Lisa Fletcher as being replaced, is because we don't know that for a fact just because she isn't listed as executive producer. She and Fred Birckhead, were both listed as executive producers on Invasion, it was just Fletcher as Executive Pro on Champs Vs Pros, with someone else listed as co-executive producers, this time it's just Birckhead as executive prod, with two other people as co-executive producers.

The two co-executive producers wouldn't be considered replacements for her since they distinguish a difference between executive and co-executive producers when listing them in press releases. So saying those two were ones to replace her wouldn't be accurate either way. Birckhead was executive producer with her on season 29, so it's not like he replaced her either since he was already there. She was possibly dropped for this season, or also possibly working on the show still under a different title. Maybe when show airs and we see full credit listing it will be easier to source.

July 2017[edit]

Your recent editing history at Frankie Grande shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You're probably already familiar with 3RR, but just in case, I wanted to make sure you'd been (recently) reminded of the policy. —C.Fred (talk) 18:26, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sdfakjdfjklklasdf, do it again, and you'll be reported. Thank you. Cassianto ^Talk 19:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the ratings of a show are probably not appropriate information for bio articles, only for the show's own article. Also see WP:N and WP:BLP. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sdfakjdfjklklasdf, I'm ever so sorry for losing my temper, as I did here in my edit summary. I do hope you can forgive me. I should learn to walk away when I feel frustrated when responding to something I disagree with. Many thanks. Cassianto ^Talk 19:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...Ready for It?[edit]

Please do not change the title again. Per MOS:CT, "for" should not be capitalized. Thanks. – electricController 17:17, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift discography[edit]

The article is at I Don't Wanna Live Forever, not with the longer title, so we should link to that. If you disagree, please open a move discussion. We also use logical quotation per WP:LQ on Wikipedia, so we don't put punctuation inside song titles unless it is meant to be there. Also, as ElectricController told you above, per MOS:CT, we don't capitalise the f in "for" in song titles. Ss 112 19:07, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Keith Olbermann, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 01:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Sdfakjdfjklklasdf. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Opposition[edit]

I’ve reverted your bold move because it goes against the page’s talk page consensus re: “w/“ in the title – official names don’t matter on Wikipedia as much as the WP:COMMONNAME. Instead of cutting and pasting material, you should open up a move discussion. —. Wikipedical (talk) 08:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RWBBlood.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RWBBlood.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:48, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jay-Z albums discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parkwood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift discography[edit]

You will need to take your concerns about what's a single and what's not to the talk page per WP:BRD. Not doing this can be construed as disruptive behaviour. Ss112 14:54, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Taylor Swift discography, you may be blocked from editing. You will be reported to an administrator if you continue reverting. Take it to the talk page per WP:BRD. Ss112 23:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Sdfakjdfjklklasdf. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RWBBlood.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RWBBlood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Real World: Chicago[edit]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to The Real World: Chicago, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Challenge season 30 logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Challenge season 30 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]