User talk:Seekbeauty

Welcome!

Hello, Seekbeauty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

{{help me}} A thousand thanks for the help! I am enjoying working on articles: a little friendly guidance, as you have shown, really motivates. Quick question now: I want to show a source for the table of contents (or TOC) for Exotic Gothic (or EG) and the other books in the series. Problem: WorldCat.org and Google Books show the Exotic Gothic series, but not the TOC. Do I then cite the publisher's page as a source (as it lists the TOC), do I give my college office page (which lists each TOC), or do I try to find some site done by another person/org/database entirely that lists the TOC (though again this may be a database constructed by users, like Goodreads, or ISFDB, etc.) Really appreciate any guidance. Much obliged. Seekbeauty (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Seekbeauty. I think none of the above. Though we encourage use of reliable secondary sources as opposed to primary sources (see WP:SECONDARY) here you are seeking to cite for the order in the book itself, and not to any analysis of the source. As such, I think using the publication itself as the source for the order of the table of contents is quite appropriate. Your question seems to presuppose that sources need to be available online. This is not the case. What we require is that sources that are cited be available to the public if they wished to check themselves. This can be books, newspapers, magazines, television programs, documentaries, etc, that are only in hardcopy or on film. Please see WP:IRS and Wikipedia:Published. I take it you have the publication, so just cite to it. If i misunderstood, please re-post your request, maybe with a clarification. Just as a side note, on Wikipedia the convention is that new posts go below old, and new threads go below old threads. In other words, normally, this thread would have been started at the bottom of your talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:04, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Exotic gothic[edit]

Please read the Wikipedia manual of style, as well as the guidelines on reliable sources. The article has serious, serious format and style issues, and you can't use blocks and user websites as references in articles. This will help keep your article from getting rapidly deleted. Dennis Brown (talk) 16:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I appreciate the time and effort you take, and the directions for this first article I write--the comments truly are welcomed. To have someone who has made 14,000 edits help truly means something.
Yes, definitely I can remove all blogs and banish external links, though the blogs I had respect for as they weren't actually personal web logs, but ones created by either a department (like the English Dept. at Lone Star College, where its prof. pool is listed for all students) or a program (like the MLitt in Gothic Studies at Univ. of Stirling, Scotland). My understanding of blogs was nuanced to the point, from reading some of these Wiki instruction articles, that I thought some of them (if they were an official organ of a newspaper, college, university) were valuable or reasonably objective or at least edited, and thus could be used. On the other hand, there are enough sources in print about this Exotic Gothic series that I can cut any reference to departments and programs. Quick question, if another book I edited (not the EXOTIC GOTHIC series) says in its biography (published by Scarecrow Press, 2010) says I am teach at this college, can I cite that? Or should I stay only with the _Houston Chronicle_ article that says I teach at this college?

Now the "blocks" you mentioned refer to my layout. I'm trying to model mine after a Wiki article that hasn't any flags, the one on "Dark Matter (series)", but I have a ways to go. E.g., sometimes my HTML commands like these === keep showing in the actual article and so I'm having trouble exhibiting the order from large the smaller items... Thanks for any quick fixes you see that could make this more uniform and helpful to readers. Hopefully, I will be able to fix it so it stays around (though if it disappears there are published authors that refer to the Exotic Gothic series in their entries).
Much obliged for fixing that References problem I had yesterday!Seekbeauty (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A good place to start is to read over Wikipedia:MOS, which has links to a lot of other sections here which can help you learn how to properly format the article. The key is making the "format" look like the other articles here, ie: so similar articles are consistent in layout. Another good place is to check out similar articles that exist here and are already "pretty enough". And don't let the 14,000 edits impress you much :) I'm just an editor like any other editor here, I've just been doing it a while. You don't get a watch or even a meal when you hit 10,000 edits around here. And I don't mind helping someone who is genuinely trying to contribute. Part of that contributing also means you need to get familiar with the guidelines here. WP:N WP:V and WP:RS are must reads. A bit dry, but they are the most important guidelines that will help you create and source articles that won't end up in the delete pile. And don't be afraid to EDIT articles. Honestly, editing and improving existing articles is really the best way to learn the wikicode anyway. I also took the liberty of creating a sandbox on your talk page. It explains itself, but it is basically a place to experiment with the wikicode, headers, etc. without worrying about messing up an article. Oh, And I will post an official welcome template, with links. You can delete any of this, or the new material, when it is no longer useful. I suggest always keeping the link to you sandbox, however, as you will use that no matter how long are you edit here.. Dennis Brown (talk) 21:08, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A thousand thanks for the help! I am enjoying working on articles: a little friendly guidance, as you have shown, really motivates. Quick question now: I want to show a source for the table of contents (or TOC) for Exotic Gothic (or EG) and the other books in the series. Problem: WorldCat.org and Google Books show the Exotic Gothic series, but not the TOC. Do I then cite the publisher's page as a source (as it lists the TOC), do I give my college office page (which lists each TOC), or do I try to find some site done by another person/org/database entirely that lists the TOC (though again this may be a database constructed by users, like Goodreads, or ISFDB, etc.) Really appreciate any guidance. Much obliged.

Good advice. So I'll good ahead then and use what Wikipedia calls primary verification, i.e., use the actual EG series books, which I have, as the source for my report in the article of what the three TOC's are and the order each story went in on each TOC. Thanks for helping me so rapidly, Fuhghettaboutit. Seekbeauty (talk) 19:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Exotic Gothic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Zoran Zivkovic, Nancy Collins, Peter Bell, Milorad Pavic and David Wellington

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A wonderful eye. Thank you for catching these links to diambiguation pages. I will fix those today!Seekbeauty (talk) 17:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rely on References for giving this data, or create a new Section in the Article's TOC box?[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

In editing the Exotic Gothic article, I would like to note which original stories in the _Exotic Gothic_ Anthology Series have reappeared elsewhere later on. Depending on which book it is in the _Exotic Gothic_ Series, 20% to 35% of its original stories/new novel excerpts/novellas go on to resurface elsewhere, finding wider or foreign audiences. Some of the _Exotic Gothic_ were republished in print in 'Best of the Year' collections (some being chosen for reissue by editors from New York, London, Moscow, etc.), some were reprinted in foreign print magazines, and others were broadcast as Podcasts (after their authors were commissioned by a college to do so). Last, some of the stories go on to be nominated for this or that prize.

I thought noting the reappearances might be valuable: noting shows the fictions' continued life elsewhere (especially outside of America), and may suggest the Series is relevant or watch-worthy. Noting helps students find the stories in other form(the books are used in college classes), and raises the question of why some horror/fantasy authors and dark subjects matter greatly to public & editors right now.

But enough background on my part. Would you recommend I have a separate Section added to the TOC to put this data (perhaps called 'Legacy', 'Reappearance and Awards', or something better you suggest)? Or, would the article be streamlined and invite less repetition (i.e.,, having to name the story again, when it was already given once on each book's TOC), to put a Reference Number after each original story that has gone on to something bigger, and then a curious reader could just go to the Reference Section?

Any advice, WikiVets? Many thanks. Seekbeauty (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean to be trite, but the Exotic Gothic article is about Exotic Gothic -- the future life of those stories outside of Exotic Gothic really isn't important to Exotic Gothic itself and doesn't really warrant whole sections on the Exotic Gothic page. That being said, when a story has been published in multiple places by multiple people, it may be notable enough for you to create a page for it, or if the story itself isn't notable enough, then it would likely at least have a mention on the author's Wikipedia page. In those cases, you'd link to the story's page or the author's page from the Exotic Gothic page.

Now, it looks like you have generally been doing a good job of using reliable secondary sources that are independent of Exotic Gothic for the Exotic Gothic article. I wasn't sure whether you'd realized (and I thought you might be happy to hear this), Exotic Gothic and its website are independent second hand source which you can use for story or author Wikipedia articles. If you'd like any further help, contact me on my user talk page or put a {{help me}} template up on your own user talk page and someone will be along to help you. :) Banaticus (talk) 23:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the very constructive ideas, Banaticus. And thanks for the approval on how the _Exotic Gothic_ sources are shaping up, which is cheering. Seekbeauty (talk) 02:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:EXOTIC GOTHIC 4 wraparound cover.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:EXOTIC GOTHIC 4 wraparound cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:47, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Exotic Gothic 5 V2 Full Dust Jacket.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Exotic Gothic 5 V2 Full Dust Jacket.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks for noting this. As the editor of the collection I can obtain a statement from both the publisher and the photographer to say that they would like the image to be used in the Wiki entry. Would that help, and how do I place the statements in? Please help or advise, so that I follow the convention as I should. Thanks and best wishes.Seekbeauty (talk) 22:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Centipede Press (November 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This still needs all additional in-depth third-party news overall, but please no press releases, trivial passing mentions or interviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Centipede Press and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 20:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Seekbeauty. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Centipede Press has been accepted[edit]

Centipede Press, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 19:17, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What's going on?[edit]

Hey there, your editing on Centipede Press came across my radar and I'd like to know if you are possibility connected to them? Your editing is so far focused on this one thing in a way we call single-purpose which has been problematic wih editors on commercial topics in the past. I also noticed you didn't reply on the talkpage to my concerns [1], don't know if you just missed it, chose not to, or something else. - Brianhe (talk) 20:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are editing publishing-related articles unabated and have not answered, I'm obliged to advise you of the following noticeboard action. Brianhe (talk) 07:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is AfC integrity and Centipede Press. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 07:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EXOTIC GOTHIC 4 front cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EXOTIC GOTHIC 4 front cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Seekbeauty. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Seekbeauty. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EXOTIC GOTHIC 5 Volume I.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EXOTIC GOTHIC 5 Volume I.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]