User talk:Seetmoon

Welcome Seetmoon!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 47,452,369 registered editors!

Hello, Seetmoon. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia

Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:

1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly

2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources

3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, SUN EYE 1 16:22, 18 November 2020 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josef Yohannes (November 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GSS were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources are interview which we can't for notability, as they are not independent of the subject. The article was created by an undisclosed paid editor and then submitted by one of their socks (per off-wiki evidence) so the tone needs to be fixed to a natural point of view.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Josef Yohannes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Josef Yohannes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 03:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, with reasons given by the reviewer. You can attempt to improve the referencing (the weakness identified by the reviewer) and resubmit, or abandon the draft. This is an odd situation wherein the creator of a product - The Urban Legend comics - has less written about him than the product. David notMD (talk) 11:09, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @GSS: Seetmoon (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC) & @David notMD: Seetmoon (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC),[reply]

Josef has won significant awards. Also, there's a Norwegian page about him. Anyway, as I am connected to him, can I still edit the page directly??? What part is not in a neutral tone that I can change?

Thanks!

As long as you have clearly stated your connection on your User page (which you have), you can edit the draft directly. If it becomes accepted as an article, the guidelines are that you cease editing directly, and instead make specific recommendations for changes on the Talk page of the article. David notMD (talk) 16:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Seetmoon: But before that, I would like you to clarify your connection with recently blocked user Ablasaur (talk · contribs) and user Inoknowone (talk · contribs). Please note that there is evidence on/off-wiki that establish a connection between you and this sock farm. GSS ^💬 16:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreeing you must address the concern raised by GSS before doing any editing on this draft. David notMD (talk) 16:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Seetmoon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help with cleaning a page!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Seetmoon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, AFC Help!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @GSS: Seetmoon (talk) 22:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC) & @David notMD: Seetmoon (talk) 22:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC),[reply]

I have already replied to GSS on his talk page. I don't know if he read it or not. Here's the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GSS#Hello_GSS

I don't know them. Does this work?