User talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao/Archive 38

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


By the way...[edit]

If you want to help select my next-ish poster (might finish a couple I have half-done first), here's the list.

  • Any opera by Massenet. Well, almost. Hopefully you aren't a huge fan of his Cleopatre, Amadis, or L'Adorable Bel-Bleu. Everything else, though (unless it's already done)...

In addition:


More operas. A lot more

Best (a selection from the main list I consider particularly artistic)

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b53117713m/f1.item.r=opera%20affiche

Weirdest:

Auber (sure I missed some with him)

Audran

Bellini

Instead, do https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b531169722/f1.item.r=Bellini%20Norma.zoom and https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b53116971m/f1.item.r=Bellini%20Norma.zoom

Berlioz

Bizet

Bruneu

Chabrier, E

Charpentier

David, F. (think I missed some of his)

Debussy

Delibes

Dupont

Erlanger

Fevrier

Flotow

Gounod

Lalo

Lecocq (TONS more)

Litolff

Massenet

Massé

Messager


Meyerbeer

Offenbach (incomplete)

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b531873350.r=opera%20affiche?rk=21459;2

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b53167757m.r=opera%20affiche?rk=5815479;2

Perry

Pessard

Planquette

Puccini

Reyer (lots more available)


Saint-Saëns

Salvayre


Semet (& Georges Sand)

Strauss, J.


Strauss, R.

de Suppe

Thomas

Vasseur

Verdi


Wagner

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b53179090g/f1.item.r=opera%20affiche

Wormser

I kind of went through everything that came up on Gallica under "opera affiche". As a prioritisation, I skipped over some of the lesser composers; for example, Hervé has a ton of posters, Massé and Vasseur have a lot more than I listed - but, well, one has to prioritise a bit, aye? The Offenbach is somewhat incomplete, as, frankly, I knew I'd end up doing his stuff anyway, so I was going to leave him out at first, then decided to grab some half-way in. I've tried to limit it to viable FPs, but there might be a few in there that turn out to be horrible scans. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 03:12, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well there's La Navarraise... Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 13:31, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And Le pardon de Ploërmel. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 23:57, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Adam Cuerden: First off, my apologies for the delayed response: I've been traveling for the past week in the land of sporadic wifi, and have only just found a desktop computer in my hotel. I have it today and tomorrow: Tuesday I return to roaming for a few more days, and I suspect that I'll be essentially unavaiable until Sunday afternoon sometime. (Saturday perhaps, depending on what turns up at the airport.)
Regarding your question: I am, of course, partial to the obscure (the more the better, naturally - how many of those composers listed don't have Wikipedia articles? :-) ) That being said: I'd plump either for something of Bruneau's or for Février's Monna Vanna. Both are fairly interesting transitional composers that were once wildly popular but have dropped off considerably, and I think it might be interesting to focus on their work through that lens. It might even lead to some work on their articles (Février's used to be fairly short, though I haven't looked at it in a long time.)
For Bruneau: do you think there might be posters available for some of his other works? L'attaque du moulin is particularly interesting to me - it made it to the Metropolitan for one season, even. (I've heard some excerpts - I'd be curious to hear the whole thing, but I'm afraid it tends to be rather leaden in retrospect. That being said, I think he had a knack for orchestration, based on what I have heard.)
Slightly off-topic, but not entirely so: do you happen to have a source that might cover some copyright-free images from Georgia? (As in, Republic of, not State of.) That's where I was this past week on a sort of musical goodwill tour with my choir. Absolutely incredible experience; I believe I have your e-mail, and I'll send you a note about it (if not tomorrow then when I get back home) - I think you would get a kick out of what we were doing. We were performing a work of Zakaria Paliashvili's, and I would love to get a FP out of something of his. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:27, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To the first: Yes, but the quality for the poster of L'attaque du moulin is terrible: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b90171196/f1.item.r=l'attaque%20du%20moulin%20affiche.zoom - However, Massé, Bruneau, and a few others were ones I was only grabbing if I happened to particularly like the poster, as they came up very frequently. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 23:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's a lovely image of him that probably wouldn't be much worse to fix than any other, despite more visible damage: : https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b531188498/f1.item.r=Alfred%20Bruneau.zoom

And some good illustrations of Messador, L'attaque du moulin, and others that aren't posters: https://gallica.bnf.fr/services/engine/search/sru?operation=searchRetrieve&version=1.2&startRecord=0&maximumRecords=50&page=1&query=%28gallica%20adj%20%22Bruneau%22%20and%20gallica%20all%20%22opera%22%29&filter=dc.type%20all%20%22image%22

As for Zakaria, I MIGHT be able to get something. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 23:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, besides being excellent images in their own right, the big advantage of the two Février images is they have clear ties to other notable people - Maeterlinck and Sardou, respectively. This gives them slightly more visibility, and can be used to draw people to the opera by putting them on the pages of the works they're adapted from and such. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 23:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


By the way, if you're wondering, had GIMP crash on me mid-editing Gismonda, losing about 6 hours' work. Needed a break. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.8% of all FPs 21:06, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Adam Cuerden: Oooooof. It's fear of that sort of thing that has led me to develop a "Ctrl+S" tic which has stood me in good stead at the office... --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:15, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The trouble is, it crashed half-way through saving, corrupting the file. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.9% of all FPs 05:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Love your work! Fellow DMV resident :)

Sir Manny of Chester (talk) 22:05, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sir Manny of Chester: Why thank you. :-) I promise to love him and keep him and pet him and call him George. :-) (Apologies for the late response - I've been traveling and have had extremely limited internet access until today.) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:03, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Revert vandalism on mobile[edit]

Quick question (simply because your edit is the one I'm trying to revert to): Is there no easy way for me to revert vandalism on mobile anymore? I go back to your edit and it only lets me view source. In the past I would just go back and re-edit the last legit page to revert the intervening vandalism. See Seth Porges. Too bad blatant BLP vandalism lasted that long. :(

Peace and Passion ☮  ("I'm listening....") 09:41, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Peace and Passion: Not sure, sorry - I have very limited experience with the mobile interface beyond making single changes here and there. (Apologies for the late response - I've been traveling and have had extremely limited internet access until today.) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:00, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Hajjah Governorate[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Hajjah Governorate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rome Prize winners has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Rome Prize winners, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Underlinking[edit]

Hi, I have a query. I found Rosemary Pattenden on a clean up listing, as you tagged it as underlinked in March. The article has two links in two sentences, so I am curious whether it is really underlinked. Would it come up on an automatic list of underlinked reports? TSventon (talk) 15:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TSventon: Possibly it might - I'm not sure, as I'm not sure how such lists are generated. Regardless: it was auto-tagged by AWB as part of one of its regular cleanup tools. No skin off my nose if you remove the tag. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, unfortunately AWB seems to tag articles as underlinked if they have three or fewer links even if they are stubs, so if I remove the tag AWB will prompt people to put it back. TSventon (talk) 15:52, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Prince of Wales Obelisk, Ser Amantio di Nicolao.

Domdeparis has gone over this page again and marked it as unpatrolled. Their note is:

sorry but this should have been tagged for layout problems

Please contact Domdeparis for any further query. Thanks.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dom from Paris (talk) 18:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Castelvecchio Pascoli[edit]

Hi, dearest Ser Amantio di Nicolao, how are you? Here it's tooooo hot!!!!

Please, I opened this short stub and I ask you 4 minutes of your time, please, to correct my mistakes.

Thanks a lot for your precious and hope to hear from you soon

Rei Momo (talk) 12:52, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my dear, how are you? Please, do you have 5 minutes to read this page and correct my mistakes? Thanks a lot and have a nice week-end!!! Sincerely Rei Momo (talk) 07:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Cooley (artist) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Cooley (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Cooley (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sociable Song (talk) 19:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hi,

Please review some articles: Sobia Khan, Aalisha Panwar, Liaquat Ali Asim. Thanks. — Bukhari (Talk!) 19:09, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Albums and songs project tagging[edit]

Hi, I know you do a lot of project tagging for articles with red-linked talk pages. I was hoping you could do another run for the albums and songs projects as last did in February (and many times before that, of course). I appreciate it. If you don't get around to it, no big deal either. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 05:08, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: Sure - got a couple of things on my list to attend to first, but I'll try to get to another run soon. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 06:04, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A great man!!![edit]

Hi, dearest Ser Amantio di Nicolao, how are you? Here is tooooo hot!!!

I opened this short page about this great Brazilian writer and psycologist. Please, I ask some minute of your time to read it and correct my mistakes.

Thanks a lot for your precious help!!!

Rei Momo (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019 at Women in Red[edit]

August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131


Check out what's happening in August at Women in Red...

Virtual events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Rosiestep (talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

fascinated to see your response[edit]

In the lead paragraph of c y oconnor it says he is an irish engineer... so your removal of the category is intriguing to say the least.... if only some people could be removed from their public roles with the sleight of an wikipedia edit  !

cheers and in agf - JarrahTree 14:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: He's been recategorized into the subcategory Category:19th-century Irish engineers, and the parent category is diffusing. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
how i hate the term diffusing, thanks for the xplanation - cheers JarrahTree 14:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@JarrahTree: Not my favorite either, but it's what we've got. :-) Happy editing! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
indeed - there was a very strange stage of categories where non diffusing and diffusing seemed to be something that clouded perspective and createdapprehensiveness about what really happens (if only the latin root word might give clues as to what the hell... and so on..) - ta JarrahTree 14:30, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@JarrahTree: In certain circles I think that may still be the case. As for Latin, I can't comment...it's all Ελληνικά to me, anyway. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:38, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia on One of Sierra Leones new and famous rising star in the USA[edit]

HI THERE I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF YOU CAN LOOK INTO WRITING AN ARTICLE FOR ABFAD, ONE OF SIERRA LEONES NEW AND FAST RISING STAR THAT IS ONLY NOT AN ARTIST BUT A DIRECTOR THAT HAS DIRECTED FOR THE LIKE OF YOUNG PARIS FROM ROC NATION AND OTHERS IN THE NIGERIAN MUSIC INDUSTRY, AND HE IS Sierra Leonean.

Peter Anton article[edit]

Dear Scott,

I hope you are well.

I need your help! After 11 years, someone has marked my article about artist Peter Anton for deletion. Peter Anton is a world-renowned artist.

I do not know all the ins and outs of wikipedia. Can you assist in saving this article?

Best wishes,

Robert artacme (talk) 01:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanne Laisné (soprano)[edit]

How d'ye think this article'd do at GA? It's short, but it does seem to be fairly complete. Only thing I didn't cover was an odd hint she may have hosted some sort of one-off production at some point. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.8% of all FPs 19:29, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Cuerden: I don't spent much time over there, but honestly I'm afraid it'll be shot down for being too short. That's the trouble I've found with a lot of nineteenth-century singers; if they weren't Lablache or Patti, there's a shocking dearth of information online about them.
Let me poke around a bit in a day or so - we have a biography of Massenet somewhere around the house that might provide a bit more info. (Then again, it might not - I find such things more hit-or-miss than I'd like.) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:56, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Any luck? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.9% of all FPs 22:05, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Adam Cuerden: Sorry, no. She appears twice in the index - once is apparently a misfire (I can't for the life of me find her anywhere on the page), and the other is merely a cast list. I may go back and check the misfire again, but I don't think there's anything in it. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maggie Siner[edit]

Hello, could you please explain why the banner has been added, and which reference is insufficient of missing? every paragraph is referenced and none of it is tabloid journalism. ThanksMorningbastet (talk) 14:43, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Morningbastet: I don't know...I'm not the one who added the template in the first place. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:59, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pohick Church[edit]

Hello there, I noticed you have done an awful lot of work on Pohick Church and I was surprised to find that it isn’t a WP:GA. I would recommend nominating, I am happy to do so if you don’t want to, but I think you would be best as you have good knowledge on the subject. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:30, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Willbb234: Sorry, this fell through the cracks the other day. Feel free to nominate it if you'd like - I did have a halfhearted discussion with someone else about that at one point, but nothing came of it. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Any questions from the reviewer I may have to direct to you if I can’t answer them. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 15:32, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Willbb234: Please feel free - I'm happy to answer them. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lia Vollack[edit]

Article say she was born in 1965 and moved to nyc in 1974 to work. Is this sentence structured correctly as it seems to infer she began work when she was nine (9) yrs old? Thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgvillageden (talk • contribs) 16:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jgvillageden: That's what New Grove says - more than that I do not know. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Hello there Ser Amantio!! It's great to meet you ... I've been looking at your edits and you seem like a wonderful person.... And I wonder if you'd be interested in helping me get a wikipedia page approved? I am not very good at them, but here is what I have started. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zoee&action=history Unfortunately no one wants to help get it citated and appoved and just eep tearing it down without rea reasons. I thought the citations attached were appropriate and plentiful. Would you be able to help a fellow wikipedier?

Many thanks, Izla :-)

Americanheart44 (talk) 13:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Americanheart44: So...the reason the article is being reverted has nothing to do with the citations. It's because a previous article of that name was deleted in accordance with a vote at WP:AFD. I would start by contacting the deleting administrator and asking for advice - I don't hang out at AFD very much. Sorry I can't be of more help. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:50, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Hey there! Thank you so much for your help! Would you know how I would get in touch with these guys to help retrieve what needs to be retrieved to get the page approved? 

Many thanks, Izla Americanheart44 (talk) 21:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Americanheart44:: I would take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoee (2nd nomination) for starters - that should give you some information as to why the article was previously deleted. I'm really not the best person to ask; I don't edit pop music very much, except to do category work here and there. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:19, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kangro (surname)[edit]

Hi, can you move this to Kangro? I'm sorting out the Tibetan villages and will try to sort them out at a township-level first. Hope you're well! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Done. I've moved the village to Kangro (village) for now to preserve its history. I'm well, thanks - not getting enough sleep, but what else is new? Hope you're well as...well, as well. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:10, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'm a much earlier riser these days too, I find I don't need more than 6 hours sleep! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:15, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr. Blofeld: It's getting worse for me - I need more sleep, but I'm not always getting it. Going to have to see someone about it before too much longer... --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:18, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Have you ever done yoga? I always thought it was a bit pretentious before but I do it every day now, gives me much more energy. Some of the exercises have a huge impact on your energy and concentration. That can relax you before you go to bed and make it easier to sleep but probably doesn't work for eveybody. I've been browsing a fair amount recently. I think overall we're definitely improving. The sourcing has greatly improved overall from years back I think. Readability is gradually improving too. Still a majestic effort needed to really get the most important articles up to scratch and consistent though but the overall resource is the best it's ever been right now I think. Some of the localities I stubbed years back now have full articles on other wikis, you know the places which at the time were just falling rain or maplandia place names. That's promising. I'm sure eventually some of these Asian and African villages will have their own websites and more and more information will get online.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:25, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr. Blofeld: Well, the thing is, getting to sleep isn't the problem. Sleeping through the night is the problem. I have a tendency to wake up in the night, which is very annoying. Again...I'm going to have to talk to someone about it, see what lifestyle changes I'm going to need to start considering.
I agree that things are getting immensely better around here. I've begun striking out into certain arenas of American folklore recently - things I never thought I'd be writing about, but things that have never existed in conventional encyclopedias. It excites me greatly that we're at that stage of our development to begin seriously thinking about such things. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:41, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes sleep can be disrupted if there's not enough blood and oxygen getting to your brain when you lie down. Days I walk more and am more physically active I tend to sleep longer without waking! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:02, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jiaqiong Town There you go, now if we can get every township of China started at a minimum level like that think how much better off we'd be! It only used to just be a falling rain entry! There's a video of a village on the shore of Daru lake in one of the sources from earlier this year but I can't access it but shows you that these places are starting to be covered!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: It's other stuff that fascinates me - like that database of Yakut writers, with biographies, that I found the other week. I never would have believed something like that would exist ten years ago. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 06:03, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vlachodimos[edit]

Don't do that. They are already in Category:Surnames via the template. You're flooding my watchlist for no reason. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:05, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also you're adding it to dab pages which do not belong in that category. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:06, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

redundant category[edit]

this work is redundant: {{surname}} already adds category "Surnames". Staszek Lem (talk) 16:35, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Staszek Lem: and @Xezbeth: So I see - apologies. I won't do it again, now I know. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Montier & Gillet[edit]

Notice

The article Montier & Gillet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable manufacturer. Article fails to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Template:Districts of Alajuela Province[edit]

Hi, can you use AWB to add this template to all of the articles. Also the category: Category:Districts of Alajuela Province and remove instances where it says Category:Populated places in Alajuela Province. I'll create templates for the others soon enough.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Car rizal_District&type=revision&diff=912628583&oldid=882717855 Like dat].

@Dr. Blofeld: Done. Let me know when you're ready with the next ones and I can go for it. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019 at Women in Red[edit]

September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135


Check out what's happening in September at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Dos Papagaios River for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dos Papagaios River is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dos Papagaios River until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 19:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Clement director of Hippocrates is not 42 years old.[edit]

Brian Clement Of Hippocrates Institute is not 42 years old. I was a soap vendor at his seminar 20 years ago. He is older than me. He’s in his 70’s. Check your sources. Cheeseblintz76 (talk) 15:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cheeseblintz76: I had nothing to do with adding the birthdate to his article. If you have a source, feel free to change it. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:22, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recreate without history[edit]

Does this not present a rather significant problem with regards to copyright and attribution? I understood that this practice is not standard for that reason. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:58, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nikkimaria: The articles I'm recreating were created initially by a banned user in violation of a block; my understanding is that they were previously deleted exclusively for that reason. Recreating without the history recreates the article without attribution to the banned user. I mean, I can stop if it proves to be troublesome; I thought it would be OK in this instance. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The deletion removes the attribution, but also removes the content that requires attribution. The only previous discussion that I could find on this matter concluded that restoring the content without the attribution shouldn't be done. Has this been discussed elsewhere, to your knowledge? Nikkimaria (talk) 03:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nikkimaria: Not to my knowledge, no. Thanks for the ping - I'll leave it be for the time being. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:08, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a new subcategory[edit]

I know that you add categories to articles, so I thought you might be an expert on the subject. I am creating biographies on anthropologists who have won the Ruth Benedict Prize. I know of at least 10 of these individuals who identify as LGBT. That may be enough people to start a sub-category of Anthropologists, Category:LGBT anthroplogists. Do you think that is worth doing?, and if so, could you advise me how to create the subcategory so that it links properly with the main category, and anything other code I might need? thx MauraWen (talk) 15:10, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(pagestalker) Hi MauraWen. Starting with ten items in a new subcategory is fine. I wonder if you were aware of or had a chance to review: Category:LGBT people by occupation. Perhaps Category:LGBT anthropolgists could mirror one of them in how it's set-up, e.g. such as Category:LGBT historians. Thoughts? --Rosiestep (talk) 15:56, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Rosiestep. That's a good idea! I had not noticed the LGBT people by occupation. The code looks pretty simple. Should I add a subcategory to Category-Anthropologists and also a subcategory to Category-LGBT people by occupation; two new subcategories, or is only one needed? thx for jumping in. MauraWen (talk) 16:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosiestep: and @MauraWen: Rosie's hit on the advice I'd give. When I'm looking to create a new category, I look for others that might be useful to mirror it. Let me look quickly at some other categories and see what I can come up with. And yes - I would put two new subcategories, one for each. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:11, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosiestep: and @MauraWen: Created. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:12, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's exactly what I would have created. :) --Rosiestep (talk) 18:21, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosiestep: and @Ser Amantio di Nicolao: Thank you both! I went for a long walk on this beautiful day and returned to find the LGBT subcategories created. I will now add the LGBT individuals. MauraWen (talk) 18:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@MauraWen: Happy to be of help. For future reference, Rosiestep gave the same advice I'd offer; when I look to create a new category, I find another one with similar parameters and use that one as a model. Usually works out fine. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:29, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kathryn Lewek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen of the Night (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Could you revert the page Hollis Robbins to your last edit on August 28? You will notice that the same vandal has already removed a previous message to you. Thank you Poetic1920 (talk) 02:17, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Poetic1920: The page is now in the same state it was left in by Drmies - I would take it up with him if you have problems with the current state of the article. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you I don't know what his beef is and it seems personal I will revert to your page. Thank you!Poetic1920 (talk) 03:05, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't mind, could you please keep an eye on it -- thank you! Poetic1920 (talk) 03:08, 6 September 2019 (UTC) I want to get this right but start from the August 28 version can you help? Poetic1920 (talk) 03:19, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Poetic1920: I really think it would be better for you to take it up with Drmies. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm changing the links now -- I'll do it without doing it wholesale... Thank you!Poetic1920 (talk) 03:27, 6 September 2019 (UTC) Please feel free to let me know if I'm doing it wrong -- I'm trying!Poetic1920 (talk) 03:45, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's certainly a much cleaner article now. And yet, you restored the "Selected articles", which is T&P material, listing things without obvious selection criteria or secondary sources; you restored the non-chronological biography, which--again--is more appropriate for a resume; and half of the references are primary material--links to articles, blog posts, poems, and publisher's pages. In other words--still puffy. Drmies (talk) 14:13, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nora Houston, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. per WP:EGRS and WP:CATV we need adequate sources and article support for the LGBT cats you're adding. Elizium23 (talk) 16:54, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23: Sources are the same as those for Adele Goodman Clark, her "very intimate friend" (to use the language from one of the sources). If it's good for one it should be good for the other, seems to me. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:00, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WP:EGRS: For a dead person, there must be a verified consensus of reliable published sources that the description is appropriate. Historically, LGBT people often did not come out in the way that they commonly do today, so a person's own self-identification is, in many cases, impossible to verify by the same standards that would be applicable to a contemporary BLP. For a dead person, a broad consensus of academic and/or biographical scholarship about the topic is sufficient to describe a person as LGBT. Elizium23 (talk) 17:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your extrapolation would be considered original research. I've removed cats from her "very intimate friend"'s article as well... Elizium23 (talk) 17:11, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am spot-checking your prolific contributions. Could you share with us your methods for determining that articles belong to these categories prior to your use of HotCat? Because it has time-consuming for me to find verifiable evidence inside the articles, much less in the sources provided. If you have automated it somehow, then perhaps we can adjust the algorithm to reduce false positives.
Elizium23 (talk) 22:18, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Elizium23: Kapur was described with others as being "members of the LGBT community" in her article, and Newby was described as "gay". Murphy was categorized in a number of LGBT-related categories when I added the category. Nothing automated - I go by evidence from within the articles. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 07:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I'm sure you've received this before, but thank you for being the life support of Wikipedia for so long <3 Dibbydib (talk) 03:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dibbydib: I am just one of many...but thanks for the hardware. Stars are always nice, in my eyes or otherwise. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:29, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited José Manuel Puig Casauranc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

The Categorisation Barnstar
You always help with things like the categories, things I wouldn't have thought of ☕ Antiqueight chatter 14:56, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Antiqueight: Thanks very much - you're very kind. Always happy to be of help. Happy editing, and keep up the good work - I always enjoy seeing your name attached to things. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:59, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keiji Nishitani[edit]

You deleted a Category, saying it was already in in a subcategory. Which category is the subcategory? Editor2020 (talk) 23:18, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Editor2020: In this instance...Category:20th-century Japanese philosophers, as Category:Japanese philosophers is a subcategory of Category:Japanese writers. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Editor2020 (talk) 00:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you![edit]


Editor2020 (talk) 23:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Editor2020: Thanks very much - I could use the milk. :-) (Unless it's a billy goat, in which case...well, yes.) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorting Names RFC[edit]

Sorting Names RFC[edit]

Due to your extensive editing experience on Wikipedia I wanted to let you know of an RFC currently going on that maybe you'd like to weigh in on regarding the proper criteria used in sorting surnames, I'd love to hear your opinion on the subject. If you would like to offer your opinion on this editorial discussion, it's located here. Thanks!

October Events from Women in Red[edit]

October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140


Check out what's happening in October at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nothing?[edit]

There's no Nepal 100 years old categories from Madhav Prasad Ghimire, where is Nepal Centenarians? Ryan Pikachu (talk) 23:29, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ryan Pikachu: Don't know, sorry. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HI Ser Amantio di Nicolao, I am new to wikipedia and still learning, I have tried adding some additional sources to the article for artist Carrie Able that see that it is flagged for possible deletion after I did so, I was wondering if you have any suggestions for me or are able to help as I see that you previously edited this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by SarahW2019 (talk • contribs) 13:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What about Prince Naruhiko Higashikuni? theres no Japan Centenarians Categories Ryan Pikachu (talk) 18:26, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ryan Pikachu: Yes, there is. And if there's not, you can always create one. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

oops. what about Begum Kulsum Saifullah Khan? theres said died aged 91 but its 90 years old most source and also born 95 age. Ryan Pikachu (talk) 18:50, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ryan Pikachu: If you have sources showing that the article is incorrect, you can always add them and change the information in the article. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What about Anton Graf von Arco auf Valley? theres no Road accident death in Austria Categories, can you help find it? Ryan Pikachu (talk) 06:13, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ryan Pikachu: Yes, there is. And if there's not...there's no reason you can't create it. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 06:32, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Learning from your experience[edit]

Hi, read with interest of your work and would like to talk sometimes as I am building www.hobbyDB.com, a database of every collectible ever made. In a way, we consider ourselves the natural extension to Wikipedia (we have 50,000 pages on Hot Wheels, 80,000 for Hard Rock Cafe related merchandise etc etc - these are pages that have value to some but would not suite Wikipedia). I would love to learn from Wikipedia. We now have 6,000 contributors and need more rules and more standards, something that must have been an issue here. Can we talk sometimes? christian@hobbydb.com.

Thanks! Joschik (talk) 04:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)Joschik[reply]

Sudhakar Chaturvedi[edit]

Hello. Just so you are aware, your additions of Category:Year of birth missing (living people) to Sudhakar Chaturvedi's article are getting removed because he is already in "year of birth uncertain", which is a more appropriate category given that we have a claimed year (1897), but a reliable source (Guinness World Records) that disputes that claim. His year of birth, therefore, is not so much missing (since there is a suggestion of what it might be) as it is uncertain. Canadian Paul 17:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Canadian Paul: Thanks. I'll try to remember, next time I run a PetScan for the task, to correct for that category. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:55, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Felix Franfurter article seems to link to the incorrect Alison Weir[edit]

Hi, there are two Alison Weirs that write books, right now the frankfurter article links to the one who writes british historical fiction. The other one is an American activist,(you have contributed to her article),and the book in question was for sure written by her, as her article says. Thanks.Rich (talk) 20:18, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

First, hello ... I'm Ched. I had a question about this edit. I'm guessing it is because Mr. Davis wasn't from Africa? I'm not questioning in a right/wrong sense, but more a "I don't want to make a mistake about these types of things". The reason I noticed is that I have most of the Rat Pack on my very short watchlist. TY for your time. — Ched (talk) 03:06, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ched: The article is already in the category Category:African-American male singers. While this is a non-diffusing category, it's non-diffusing to Category:American male singers; Category:African-American singers is redundant. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:38, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. Thank you. — Ched (talk) 09:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Suicides by hanging in Slovenia[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Suicides by hanging in Slovenia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:46, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agnieszka Dobosz[edit]

Hi SAdN, long time! You know I respect your contributions a lot, but I have serious doubts whether Agnieszka Dobosz is notable. One print in a single museum, pretty much no sources (I did a search for Polish sources, nothing comes up...). Can you expand it? If we cannot find more sources, I think it should be deleted :( --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:01, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: Ye-e-e-e-es...I take your point about museum collections, but I'm inclusionist enough to accept that criterion. :-) As to other sources: Google Books UK indicates there are a couple of sources I might be able to use to flesh it out a bit, were they not behind a firewall. Not perfect, but there's something there, it seems. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 13:37, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Something, sure, I mean, it's not a hoax :> And there are some pictures of her work, etc. But... I am sorry, in the current state I think this merits an AfD. Do you want this to be moved to your userpace while you work on it? Or should we do the 'trial by fire' at AfD? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:17, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Piotrus: Let's draftify, then. Let it die a slow, undignified death from attrition. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Than I'd suggest you just move it back to your userpace, and the redirect will get deleted from the mainspace in a short while by some cleanup admin. Sorry I just came by here to complain about this, you know I love 99% of your other contribs even if I don't say thank you for each and every one of them :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:25, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Piotrus: No need to apologize. I'm grateful for the input - I'm doing a raft of articles about printmakers in the Gallery's collection, and I'm finding myself really at a loss as a non-native speaker of Czech, especially. Let alone Polish - I'm always grateful for another pair of eyes. (And that's leaving aside the stuff I've been doing in Georgian...) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:39, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Megan Rice[edit]

hello, Sir Wimsey. I am trying to get Megan Rice (89 year old nun who served prison time for anti nuclear weapons protests) article in order before she dies. I am not neutral, I knew her years ago and she is wonderful. I am rather new to being an editor (my virgin article was published last week, Phillip N Butler )would you look at the page for problems? Toandael49 (talk) 14:57, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Toandanel49: Sure - I'll be glad to take a look shortly. I might also recommend asking around over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red if you'd like another pair of eyes. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:59, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Toandanel49: Looks good. I made a few minor tweaks, mostly in terms of language; the one major thing I did was to rework the image into a thumbnail. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:10, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Just to let you know that the page that you have removed in 7 July is now online again:

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Alonso_Martinez

Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.168.131.117 (talk) 15:40, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Evasion per off-wiki evidence.[edit]

Hello, Just to let you know that the page that you have removed in 7 July is now online again: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Alonso_Martinez Thank you very much for your cooperation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.168.131.117 (talk) 12:03, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Motu Akea concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Motu Akea, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:43, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edits in Lebanese government of 2019[edit]

Greetings, firstly I would like you to know that I greatly respect your work. As you may be aware, ongoing protest, here in Lebanon, are denouncing corrupt officials and politicians, those edits in the article in the subject, were not, in my opinion, vandalism, they were also denouncing those same greedy politicians in our native tongue( we commonly use a mix between Latin alphabet and Arabic by representing sounds that have no equivalent in Latin with numbers on the internet), I understand that you are only trying to prevent misinformation and bias, and that you are trying to uphold Wikipedia's standards of objectivity by locking the article, and i understand if you choose to ignore this message as this is obviously an irregular case, after all if we were to consider the Wikipedia rules, no expression of one's biases and opinions is allowed while editing an article. But it would mean a great deal for me, and for a lot of Lebanese if you removed this article's protected status, to allow us to continue our struggle against this tyrannic government of ours, I hope you understand that the motives behind editing the article did not contain any ill-will and au contraire, it was a way for our people to raise awareness about our issues, if you believe removing this article's protected status jeopardizes your reputation and trust with other users of wikipedia then ignore this message, but i do not believe it will do so. Thank you

P. S: yes I made an account just for you. Welp, better start editing I guess. P. P. S: Sorry if I made any mistake, but English is my second to last language. P. P. P. S: This has been written on mobile. Update:Wow!! It's only been like what 2 days since I posted this and it already has like 2000 up votes,thank you all for your support, I appreciate it, yet it appears that Amantio ignored me,I highly expected that to be frank, no matter, I for one respect his decision, even though I do not agree, thank you all again for this support. Kellon Ya3ne kellon!!! P. P. P. P. S: BTW the whole up vote thing was a reddit joke if someone didn't understand.

Whiztale (talk) 11:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago[edit]

Awesome
Ten years!

... and still today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There should be a Category:Recipients of the Friedenspreis des Deutschen Buchhandels, no? People wo received the Friedenspreis des Deutschen Buchhandels peace prize. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: I'll look. May not be for a few days - I have a lot on my plate at the moment. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:24, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bulbophyllum kupense[edit]

Hello, Ser Amantio di Nicolao. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bulbophyllum kupense".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 20:13, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barn star for you![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I’m pretty sure you’ve received a ton of these at this point but thanks for your tireless work and effort you put into Wikipedia. Seeing you in one of those videos was actually one of the reasons I joined Wikipedia! You truly are a blessing. HurricaneGeek2002 (talk) 02:37, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@HurricaneGeek2002: You're very kind, thanks. I'm glad to know that the video inspired you. That's a large part of why I do such interviews; I want people to see that Wikipedia is created and edited by ordinary people. Happy to know it's working. :-)
Happy editing! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 13:42, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Using bots to make translating articles easier[edit]

I am translating articles that are only in Spanish into English for the Women in Red, I started with Elsa Matilde Zardilla, and it was hard. I have been reading advice about translating using bots and google translate to help, (I am bilingual in Spanish ) but the advice is confusing. What do you recommend for a beginner , i.e. easiest to use.Toandael49 (talk) 14:28, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Toandanel49: It's tricky...I've never found a mechanical translation program that really does the trick, for a variety of reasons. When I'm translating an article from another language, I find Google Translate is the most helpful tool; I will run the Wikipedia article through Translate to get some sense of what it's about, but I'll rework it in English rather than publishing a straight translation. And I always look for sources; if the non-English Wikipedia article is poorly sourced, I'll try and source as much of it as I can when I create an English version. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:34, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Content check requested, please[edit]

Hello! With your admin / experienced editor hat on, could you please have a quick look at this edit? (I chose you because I see you've edited the article recently, sorry!) I note that it has added an astonishingly long list, and that it is the editor's only contribution so far. This is of course not necessarily a bad thing, but I do wonder. I was only brought to it by a spelling error but was a bit horrified by what I then saw ... I was tempted to just zap it out but thought I should probably ask a policy-aware grownup about it! Cheers DBaK (talk) 10:38, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered: I know others may disagree, but I don't see anything inherently wrong with a bibliography like that when it's added to an article. (At least once I've seen another article when the bibliography was pruned, however, so mileage varies.) But it's overwhelmingly large, and it's been poorly formatted, so I think you would be fine removing it or cutting it down, depending on what you'd prefer. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

American female singers[edit]

Hi, Could you explain the purpose of removing the category as the majority of articles aren't in singer cats, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 02:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010: They're in the subcats Category:20th-century American women singers and Category:21st-century American women singers. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:23, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah so they are, In that case nevermind lol, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 02:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: Any time. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Claire Thompson for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claire Thompson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Thompson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Anome (talk) 21:17, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019 at Women in Red[edit]

November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143


Check out what's happening in November at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Gloria Casarez[edit]

I see that you worked on the Gloria Casarez article, I have done some work on it, I am still new, would you check it? Toandanel49 (talk) 00:12, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Six-million pool[edit]

Only 35,000 to go now to reach it but it's been 4 years since we passed 5 million. A bit depressing really given how many people visit us. Looks like it's be early 2020?? we'll pass it now unless we unleash some sub stubs every day until Christmas. ;-).♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your kind help requested to revise Draft:Anton Smit (sculptor)[edit]

Dear User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao, your kind help is hereby requested to revise and hopefully improve Draft:Anton Smit (sculptor). As you may notice the draft article has been rejected by User:Theroadislong on the basis of the subject "not showing significant coverage in reliable, secondary, independent sources". Since from your edit record I notice an interest of yours in subjects dealing with visual arts, I wonder if you could kindly consider revising my draft with a view to addressing the objections raised. Your kind help will be gratefully appreciated.Neuralia (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao, within the above, may I now bring to your attention a fresh improvement to the article based on the artist´s work being a "significant monument/part of a significant exhibition" as required by the submission´s decliner. Could you please spare a moment to take a look and hopefully leave your opinion on the submission´s talk page? Thank you.Neuralia (talk) 14:17, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eponymous metric?[edit]

Hi and thanks for all your wonderful contributions. I really enjoyed the CBS interview.

I am working on a long-term project to measure how various topics are covered in the media. As part of that, I have devised a bunch of metrics, one of which is a sort of Erdős number for Wikipedia contributors that I'd like to name after you if it's OK. The number calculates two metrics:

  • a user's Wikipedia contributions (not simply edit count BTW)
  • their notability (not simply pageviews on their Wikipedia biographical article BTW)

I'd like to call it the Pruitt number if that's OK, but I wanted to check in first. You have the highest number in the current iteration of the equation, even edging out Jimbo. If you have another name suggestion, I'm all ears! Jokestress (talk) 17:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jokestress: It may be the mead talking, but I'm perfectly fine being its namesake. :-) Thanks very much for the honor. (Besides which, I can't really think of another name off the top of my head...again, maybe it's the mead talking.) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 23:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Martha Ann Honeywell[edit]

Hi, found some links you might have missed on Martha Ann, on Ancestry.com:

Biography & Genealogy Master Index (BGMI)
Family Histories, Journals & Biographies
Record information.
Name
Martha Anne Honeywell
Birth
1787
Death
1848
Biography & Genealogy Master Index (BGMI)
Family Histories, Journals & Biographies
Record information.
Name
Martha Ann Honeywell
Birth
1787
Biography & Genealogy Master Index (BGMI)
Family Histories, Journals & Biographies
Record information.
Name
Martha Ann Honeywell
Birth
1787
Death
1848
Biography & Genealogy Master Index (BGMI)
Family Histories, Journals & Biographies
Record information.
Name
Martha Ann Honeywell
Birth
1787
Death
1848

And I think I'll stop now, and get some sleep! Martha (talk) 04:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Martha Forsyth: Wonderful, thanks - I'll work on incorporating some of this material into her article over the next few days. Meantime I'll see Thea on Tuesday - I'll let her know we talked. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 06:55, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your efforts[edit]

According to this, you have "expanded the share of biographical articles about women from 15% to 17.6% in a few short years." Great stuff! Amazing what just one editor can do if he puts his mind to it.--Ipigott (talk) 13:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: That number seems a wee bit suspect to me, to be honest...I think it's very much a collective number, rather than anything I've done on my own. Still and all, thanks for the kind words. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:58, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It was meant to be something of a "tongue in the cheek" remark but I do sincerely appreciate all the women's biographies you have been creating. I'm sure there will be many more to come. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 19:37, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ipigott: My apologies - that's what I get for attempting to edit first thing in the morning afternoon after waking up. On the plus side I think I've recovered enough of my equilibrium to pass for sensible once again... --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 20:36, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Novelists[edit]

It's taken me five years to notice, but some of your previous AWB runs have categorized short story writers as novelists when they have never written a novel to my knowledge, and the article doesn't suggest that they have. Kelly Link for example. Something to bear in mind if you're still doing writer category runs. —Xezbeth (talk) 20:37, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Xezbeth: I noticed it after I'd done a few runs...something in the way science-fiction writers are categorized, as I recall. I've tried to clean up what I can. Thanks for the note - I do try to bear it in mind when I do category runs these days, but there's always the likelihood that something's going to slip through. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 20:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Motu Akea[edit]

Hello, Ser Amantio di Nicolao. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Motu Akea".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're Invited![edit]

Hello Ser Amantio di Nicolao/Archive 38! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women in music, an outreach effort which aims at improving articles about women music on Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Thank you!

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing new (draft) article[edit]

hello Ser Amantio di Nicolao,

Could I please ask you to review and comment on this draft article? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hanoch_Senderowitz

Many thanks, Uw0v5033 (talk) 16:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rena Dumas[edit]

Hi, I'm creating the page for Rena Dumas. The book on her life and work is being released today. But I am doing the French first, so I'll leave the English as it is. Thanks.

Thank you[edit]

Thank You for all the work that you are doing with the categories in the Puerto Rican related articles. I would give you a Barnstar, but when I saw your "awards" page I was amazed at the fact that you have more barnstars then there are "barns" and "stars". Tak e care my friend. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Marine 69-71: Thanks very much - you're very kind. Please let me know if you ever see me put a step wrong; I'm happy to clean things up as needed.
Happy editing - I've long admired the work you do on Puerto Rican topics. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:16, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AWB error[edit]

Just wanted to flag this edit, where a stray } in the infobox was turned into }}, cutting the infobox short and putting the rest of the wikicode in the text. Wikiacc () 21:12, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikiacc: Thanks for letting me know...sorry that it slipped through. I'll try to keep an eye out to see if it happens again. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December events with WIR[edit]

December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147


Check out what's happening in December at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Proposed deletion of Temarama Anguna[edit]

Notice

The article Temarama Anguna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject is not actually Minister for Agriculture (who is Rose Toki-Brown)- according to refs she is secretary (or "head") of the Ministry of Agriculture. Also see the Ministry Facebook page [1] As a civil servant, subject does not meet WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hi there, after a bit of research I couldn't find enough on the subject to get past WP:GNG either, so thought it best to prod. Curdle (talk) 10:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

a better way to categorise?[edit]

A few years back, I noted that deWP had a very clean way of categorising subjects, with each individual attribute having a separate tag.

Male | Born 1972 | American | Composer | Musician | Classical music

Very simple, clear and pretty stable. I presume that the search tools allow any arbitrary combination of tags, so supporting searches on left-handed, ginger-haired, French opera composers. The enWP cateories appear to me, in contrast, as an overly-constrained and mysterious timesink.

American male classical composers | American classical composers | Texas classical music | Musicians from St. Louis | 20th-century classical composers | 21st-century classical composers | Living people | 21st-century American composers | 20th-century American composers | Classical musicians from Missouri | 20th-century American male musicians | 21st-century American male musicians

That list surely could be rendered down to a much clearer and more straightforward list of attributes? and one that (in addition) would allow a wider range of searches on all combinations, eg 'Composers from St Louis' etc etc etc.

I'd love to see this in enWP (but don't know where to suggest it). Am I missing something? You are clearly engaged with the current enWP system. Does it have advantages that I am just not seeing? In perplexity Scarabocchio (talk) 11:47, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Found bad information. Needs to be updated.[edit]

First navy jack flag is listed as being flown on the wrong ship if you follow the "don't tread on me" information. It appears to be correct on its own page. I have no desire to edit wikipedia. Would you mind fixing this?

Again "don't tread on me" page listing "first navy jack" on wrong vessel. Very out dated information.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:43C0:8600:956C:42E:D4E1:95D (talk) 08:26, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Irish male non-fiction writers[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Irish male non-fiction writers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there![edit]

Hello Ser Amantio di Nicolao, I am new to Wikipedia (October 2019), and was wondering if you could adopt my account, because you are the most experienced, and active Wikipedia editor, i look forward to your response! Gumshoe97 (talk) 00:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nuclear energy in Morocco[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nuclear energy in Morocco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nuclear energy in Algeria[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nuclear energy in Algeria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nuclear energy in Libya[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nuclear energy in Libya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nuclear energy in Tunisia[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nuclear energy in Tunisia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding your Category edits[edit]

Greetings, Ser Amantio. I just came across a recent edit where you changed a category - and marked it as a "minor edit". That surprised me. I thought perhaps it was just a tiny mistake in the course of the endless stream of edits you make. But just to be sure, I took a look at your contributions and was astonished to see a long list of category changes that were ALL marked as "minor edits".

I am genuinely speechless. I would have thought that a dedicated editor with your vast experience would know better than to mark category changes as "minor edits". Hmmmm.... Come to think of it, I've come across many of your category edits over the years, and I don't recall them being marked as "minor". In fact, I'm pretty sure I would have left you a note a long time ago if that were the case. Huh. Now I am really scratching my head. What gives?? Have you perhaps inadvertently changed a setting or something? Regards, Anomalous+0 (talk) 10:02, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ahah. I think I've discovered the probable source of the problem. I just found some edits you made back in 2016. You were using AWB at that time, and those category edits were NOT marked as "minor". But you switched over to Cat-a-lot some time back, and now ALL of those edits are being marked as "minor". (Please be kind enough to ping me when you reply. Thanks!) Anomalous+0 (talk) 12:21, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Anomalous+0: I have actually been asked on multiple occasions over the years, by multiple editors, to mark my AWB edits as minor. This includes category changes - I've been told that they clutter up watchlists. (I cannot say, myself - I don't really use my watchlist for much.)
As for Cat-a-lot, thats's a horse of a different color; I have very little control over its settings, as far as I know. And most of those are set over at Commons regardless. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:16, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info, Ser Amantio. I've never used either, so I'm not familiar with their settings. If what you said about the Cat-a-lot settings is indeed the case, this is a much larger problem than I feared, because that would mean a lot of other Category edits are being marked as "minor" -- which they most assuredly are not. I guess I will have to take this issue up with the folks over at Commons. Thanks again. Regards, Anomalous+0 (talk) 00:12, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Molly Hill[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Molly Hill requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Chip🐺 • #TeamTrees🌳 21:05, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Njogu Touray[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Njogu Touray requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:05, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Shafer Article[edit]

I noticed you did some editing on Dan SCHafer article. I have been working on Dan SHafer article from the voice television show. I just got rejected stating that sources are not reliable. I took sources from records recorded, Newspapers directly, NBC, etc... would you please help me with this that I might get it published. I would greatly appreciate your help! Here is link https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dan_Shafer my best to you and your family — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jingleman2 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ser Amantio[edit]

Hi Ser Amantio di Nicolao, thanks for reviewing the new article created Jennifer A. Di Toro. Would you please be able to review my request for autopatrolled rights at WP:RFP/A? Thank you. Shemtov613 (talk) 22:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lois (Lois)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lois (Lois) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  05:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like G14 was wrong, but it seemed closest on the Twinkle list. Anyway this was an old mistake that's still hanging around not accomplishing anything. SchreiberBike | ⌨  05:44, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Rosguill. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Marlie Collins, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

signed, Rosguill talk 18:28, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers[edit]

Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry

This hot Tom and Jerry is an old-time drink that is once used by one and all in this country to celebrate Christmas with, and in fact it is once so popular that many people think Christmas is invented only to furnish an excuse for hot Tom and Jerry, although of course this is by no means true.

No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well Ser. MarnetteD|Talk 01:54, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry XMAS![edit]

Merry Christmas everybody!!!
Merry Christmas everybody!!!

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.


Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:06, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Gambian painters[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Gambian painters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:46, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!

Hello, Ser Amantio di Nicolao! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:37, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

Merry merry ![edit]

~~~ is wishing you a Merry Christmas!

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 02:09, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas[edit]

Merry Christmas Ser Amantio di Nicolao

Hi Ser Amantio di Nicolao, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very happy and prosperous New Year,
Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year,
   –Davey2010talk 00:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings[edit]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020 at Women in Red[edit]

January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153


Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020!

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Good luck[edit]

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはSer Amantio di Nicolaoたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 04:03, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi, there has been an attempt to ‘delete’ my Wikipedia page , after I commented on a political post on Twitter . It is clear that The Wikipedia editor’s ( who has edited my page) action is clearly motivated by his opposite beliefs . Thanks , Gaurav Agnihotri . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.91.213.72 (talk) 08:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Gambian artists[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Gambian artists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lutheran churches in Frankfurt[edit]

Category:Lutheran churches in Frankfurt: none of the elements is a Lutheran church. The Paulskirche isn't even a church. The Dreikönigskirche is Protestant (United). We have Category:Protestant churches in Wiesbaden which is much better. Help? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:29, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: At least one of them looks like it belongs in the category - otherwise I'm not sure what you want me to do, exactly? Should be easy enough to remove the ones that don't belong. Though I don't know what the rubric is; if they were Lutheran at some point, then possibly they would belong in the category as well? --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:14, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't looked at all, just know that Protestant (German: evangelisch) is more general. Lutheran would be a subcategory if there really is one, and not that "Lutheran" also the result of sloppiness or misunderstanding. The normal evangelische Kirche in Hesse is United, Union of Lutheran and Reformed. Look at Unionskirche, Idstein, yes, the one on my user page (this year, will be different next year). Very few churches in Hesse - which Frankfurt belongs to - will be purely Lutheran, and if you se the term, it may be a mistranslation. This is different in Lower Saxony, for example. Every Lutheran church is also a Protestant church, but Protestantism comes also in many other colours. For the one you saw you may want to check their German article or website if it really says Lutherisch and not just evangelisch (which is Protestant and not Evengelical). - Happy new year! (Look there again when it comes, decoration in prep.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:19, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerda Arendt: I'm afraid disentangling this is going to be beyond my pay grade, given that I don't speak German. Sorry - I'm sure there's someone better suited to it than I would be. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 10:39, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There's no need to disentangle, just to move from one name to the other. I'd do the follow-up if you ping me. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:31, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerda Arendt: I've moved the four into Category:Churches in Frankfurt and made Category:Lutheran churches in Frankfurt for now. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:46, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ria Persad[edit]

Dear Ser,

Can you please have a look at the edits I made concerning Ria Persad?

If they are okay, can you please remove the maintenance template?

I do not know how to do this, so I would appreciate your help.

Thank you.

Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 54geren (talk • contribs) 20:55, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@54geren: I'm not a good person to ask. I don't do much with science articles, sorry. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:47, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year![edit]


George Bellows, North River (1908), Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts. 		Best wishes for a healthy and prosperous 2020.
Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place.
BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 12:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year![edit]

Ser Amantio di Nicolao,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Ser Amantio di Nicolao![edit]

Happy New Year!

Ser Amantio di Nicolao,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Eddie891 Talk Work 17:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Ser Amantio di Nicolao![edit]

Happy New Year!

Ser Amantio di Nicolao,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010Talk 00:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ser_Amantio_di_Nicolao/Archive_38&oldid=1064596992"