User talk:Sethjohnson95

Jeffree Star discography‎

Star's official website is: popsiclemusic.com and I see nothing about Sh#t. Star stated on Twitter (I believe) that one of his old producers leaked a few of his songs from the Beauty Killer era and Star used it as a way to promote his new EP. Regarding this: "It is also stated in the talk page for Beauty Killer that Get Away With Murder is not an official single." I didn't see that part that you edited. But I believe you due to the fact I keep on changing it to "Prisoner" but it gets reverted by Star himself. Devin (talk) 06:36, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

While we're at this, I believe that the artist's template page should reflect the artist's discography page and vise versa. To me, it seems like Template:Jeffree Star is more complete than Jeffree Star discography, especially in the singles section. Devin (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

It states on Wikipedia:Promotional singles that a song is a single if it's "promoted as a single and listed as a single in several publications." So, I guess that means that if the artist says that it's a promo and reliable/notable sources say that it's a single, then it's a single. But I understand how it's hard to tell them apart. Devin (talk) 07:09, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

"Prom Night!" has received radio airplay. It may have been played once or twice, but it still received it. "Lollipop," "Prisioner," and "Prom" are official singles, I'm just not sure about the rest. Devin (talk) 07:30, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

So in the template should promotional singles still be listed as 'Other singles' or should the 'Other singles' section be removed altogether? Virginity had its own page but it was deleted due to there not being enough reliable sources and the extended play not being released yet. Devin (talk) 07:45, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Show me an example of these templates that have notable songs. Devin (talk) 16:12, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Or maybe 'Other singles' should just be renamed to 'Promotional singles' so that then we can list them on the discography page under Singles: Promotional singles. That's what they did over on Lady Gaga discography. Devin (talk) 17:16, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

"Lollipop Luxury (featuring Nicki)" was release on iTunes in 2011. Wouldn't that also be a promotional single? Devin (talk) 17:32, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Okay. I've changed the discography and template pages to what we discussed. Devin (talk) 17:59, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Hopefully it stays that way. The main page's citations need to be improved, but other than that it's up to date. Devin (talk) 18:21, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Vanessa Hudgens discography

Why are you inserting dozens of dead Billboard links and reverting sections with no explanation at Vanessa Hudgens discography?—Kww(talk) 22:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

I wasn't aware of the fact that they were dead links. I simply took the chart from a previous revision of the page. The HSM songs do not count as official singles, as they weren't even released in any format other than digital (as in no radio airplay & for the most part no music videos.) --Sethjohnson 95 27 March 2013, 18:21 PM (ET)

Always a bad idea to revert without explanation and to revert intervening unrelated changes without examination.—Kww(talk) 22:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

BB15 HGs article

Hi, I have created the "List of" article for the BB15 HGs, but it needs updating. Thanks. --MSalmon (talk) 15:10, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Big Brother 15 Controversy section

Hello, Sethjohnson95. I wanted to let you know that I made a new section on the talk page of the Big Brother 15 article that I believe you will be interested in. Hopefully, this will help things out. Sincerely, --Super Goku V (talk) 02:01, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Starting a sentence with "but"

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that a claim you made to justify a recent edit — that sentences should never start with "but" — is a false superstition. See Common_English_usage_misconceptions#Grammar. Wukai (talk) 23:06, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Hellbilly Deluxe

You seem to have been the primary contributor to this article at one point. It looks great. I'm looking for an album to put up for good article nomination. Since you haven't touched this in over year, I have nominated it. If you'd like me to withdraw or put it in your name, revert the talk page and let me know. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 16:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Camila (album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 03:42, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madison Beer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Eagle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi Sethjohnson95. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article, Madison Beer. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Looking over your edit in a bit more detail, I'm seeing multiple unreliable sources, and a great deal of NOTNEWS/SOAP-type content. Please use edit summaries and keep your edits small so others can review and edit them easily. --Ronz (talk) 16:25, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sethjohnson95. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Courtesy notice - discretionary sanctions for biographical information

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Ronz (talk) 17:32, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 17:32, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Brother Canada (season 3), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Let'sBeFriends.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Let'sBeFriends.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Superficial (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yazoo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Celebrity Big Brother 1 housemates (UK) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Celebrity Big Brother 1 housemates (UK) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Celebrity Big Brother 1 housemates (UK) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gonnym (talk) 09:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Big Brother (Australian TV series) season 1 housemates for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Big Brother (Australian TV series) season 1 housemates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Big Brother (Australian TV series) season 1 housemates until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 09:51, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Big Brother 1 (American season) houseguests for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Big Brother 1 (American season) houseguests is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Big Brother 1 (American season) houseguests until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 08:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of The Glass House season 1 contestants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Glass House season 1 contestants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Glass House season 1 contestants until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 09:39, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Final.Attraction.Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Final.Attraction.Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kissandtellbackcover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kissandtellbackcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2022 (UTC)