User talk:Shahrukhwani1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A page you started (Javed Ashraf) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Javed Ashraf, Shahrukhwani1!

Wikipedia editor 333-blue just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good.

To reply, leave a comment on 333-blue's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Shahrukhwani1, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Shahrukhwani1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mahbub ul Haq, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Human development. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nawaz Sharif may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • despite the criticism of conservative religious parties.[[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:48, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nawaz Sharif, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjab Government. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome![edit]

Hello, Shahrukhwani1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MBlaze Lightning (talk) 14:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heller School for Social Policy and Management, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public affairs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquote[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. You may have noticed that your attempts to add a list of reactions to the Lahore bombings has been reverted and are perhaps wondering why. Although following the method used to create similar article is often a good starting point, you should consider that it may not be the best way. This is perhaps the case with a list of country's reactions. However, we have a similar project called Wikiquote which would be suitable for your edits. You may create an article at wikiquote:2016 Lahore suicide bombing to list these quotes. I recently made wikiquote:Bacha Khan University attack, which could be a helpful example. We can then link the reactions section of our Wikipedia article to the Wikiquote article with {{wikiquote}}. Thanks and any questions, you can ask me. Jolly Ω Janner 21:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Safa Gold Mall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upscale. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited One Constitution Avenue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upscale. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Emporium Mall.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SMS Talk 14:19, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 19 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Forman Christian College
added a link pointing to Rang Mahal
Lahore
added a link pointing to Punjab University

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tourism in Pakistan
added links pointing to Hunza, Haripur and Hawk's Bay
New Islamabad International Airport
added a link pointing to Greenfield
Pakistan
added a link pointing to Clifton Beach

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 3 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sabeen Mahmud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Benazir Bhutto
added links pointing to Reconciliation and Prime Minister's Office
Murree Brewery
added a link pointing to Multinational

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17 September 2016[edit]

Summary usage

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! 220 of Borg 17:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With edits like this for example, it is almost impossible to see what you have done. You are making large unexplained edits like this. I strongly suggest that you make smaller edits and explain them as well, as they are done. 220 of Borg 18:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Surname

You seem to be frequently using people's first name, Benazir, Fatima etc, rather than their surnames, which is not how it's done on Wikipedia. Please see WP:SURNAME for more guidance. 220 of Borg 18:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maleeha Lodhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faculty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign policy[edit]

What's your view on starting an article on Foreign policy of Nawaz Sharif like these articles? I feel the main article is getting very long and a split is inevitable regardless. Mar4d (talk) 13:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hoshang Pearl for deletion[edit]

Hello. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoshang Pearl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoshang Pearl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:28, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adil Najam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Financial aid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. the first reference that you provided is not reliable so please don't add it to backup the claim while the second reference doesn't mention the "Aurangzeb hold's a BA from Quaid-e-Azam University, and master's degree in environment and development from King's College London. She previously worked with Worldwide Fund for Nature as a senior communication's manager. She is the daughter of Senator Mushahid Ullah Khan." --Saqib (talk) 12:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wani is a Kashmiri surname. Are you in Indian administered Kashmir?Towns_Hill 23:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Towns Hill (talkcontribs)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Shahrukhwani1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Pakistan–Turkey Free Trade Agreement) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Pakistan–Turkey Free Trade Agreement, Shahrukhwani1!

Wikipedia editor Robvanvee just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The article could use some expansion. Otherwise, good job!

To reply, leave a comment on Robvanvee's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Deletion discussion about Mall of Islamabad[edit]

Hello, Shahrukhwani1,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mall of Islamabad should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mall of Islamabad .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, scope_creep (talk) 14:03, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Large edits disregarding wikipedia style[edit]

Please break up your edits into smaller pieces so that other editors can critique your work without so much effort. I've reverted your recent edit on Fatima Jinnah because it messes up quite a few things that are established wikipedia style. As has been noted above, there are sources such as WP:Manual of style that describe the established patterns. Smaller edits are beneficial because then people who alter or revert them will probably explain particular points and that is a good way for you to learn. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:36, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan 03 1987 Royal Albert Hall (cropped).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan 03 1987 Royal Albert Hall (cropped).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

London School of Economics[edit]

Please do not readd JF Kennedy to the LSE page, instead see the Talk:London_School_of_Economics page for a reference to the LSE archives which show he never attended. Thanks Aloneinthewild (talk) 14:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Information icon Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Ahsan Iqbal. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 08:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

regarding your summary as per lead section[edit]

You did not carry out summary as per guidelines. You just deleted it from wikipedia.
Don't play stupid with me. It is evidently clear that if there is a summary as per guideline you modify the summary and move sections into sub sections.
I have edited articles with other wikipedians on Recep Tayyip Erdogan and have noticed a change in behaviour regarding Wikipedians who properly divide the article into sections and subsections.
Do NOT just delete information from an article which is fully referenced and cited from Foreign Policy, Express Tribune (International New York Times), Reuters, DunyaNews and the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI)
and think that you can get away with this for free.

Should this act of vandalism persist I will report your, wikipedia input behaviour to committees and have your account suspended. This is a flagrant violation of ethical rules consisting of personal opinion.

This concerns your edits regarding Nawaz Sharif an article clearly under watch as it is the prime minister. Do not think that other wikipedians will not care once I report this, I have experience in many cases
and have come out on the winning side, simply because you editors violate basic rules.

You cannot, I repeat cannot just remove refernced material. One And then put "summary as per lead guidelines" --> which is a blatanat lie that anyone can detect Kind regards, (Wiki id2(talk) 23:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Regarding facts of "simple majority"[edit]

Btw Nawaz Sharif did not recieve a simple majority. Mr Sharif has made for awkward bedfellows in a coalition with Maulana fazl-ur-Rehman (JUI-F) and ethnic Pashtuns (PkMAP) do not just say he got a simple majority when clearly he did not receive a majority mandate from the Pakistani people. This is where you draw a line between your personal political affiliation and affection for Mr Sharif with wikipedia editing

Kind regards, (Wiki id2(talk) 23:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Another point regarding "summary"[edit]

You may know from reading Pakistani news sections that the only thing Mr Sharif is in the news for these days is the panama papers trial. You cannot just exclude that from the lead section
and pretend somehow that it does not exist.

Kind regards, (Wiki id2(talk) 23:37, 5 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

With regards to FY 2016-17[edit]

This bloomberg article and section you have added is more relevant to the Economy of Pakistan page.

On Febuaray 6th, 2017, Tyler Cowen writing for Bloomberg termed Pakistan as the most "underrated economy in the world."[1]

This article talks generally about the Pakistani economy, not about the Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.

Wikipedia has rules regarding relevance. Facts (and interpretations of economic data) belong on the Economy of Pakistan page. This is very useful input, please transfer this section for the Pakistani economy page rather than on Nawaz Sharif's personal article.
(Wiki id2(talk) 08:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

References

  1. ^ Cowen, Tyler (FEB 6, 2017). "Pakistan's Economy Is a Pleasant Surprise". Bloomberg LP. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)

Simple majority[edit]

No that is the difference between majoritarian and proportional representation seats. Those seats on which Nawaz Sharif attained his mandate are the 2/3 male seats which are majoritarian. Not the 1/3 female seats which are proportional election. He fell 9 seats short of a majority even once independents entered his party.

Anyways thank you for nitpicking. You have acknowledged by the way that all your other editing and removing 6-7 referenced sources regarding Panama leaks were not just irrelevant but wrong. I wanted to give you credit for a decent mention of a bloomberg article and that it should be neutrally read and rationally dealt with on the Economy of Pakistan page rather than a Nawaz Sharif page. It is unfortunate that even when I tried to give you a complement you could not accept it in good faith. Sometimes not digging deeper is the best option.
Kind regards,

(Wiki id2(talk) 20:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Cyril Almeida does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 14:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 18 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding a response[edit]

You are the one who has clearly violated wikipedia rules regarding proper referencing. You deleted fully sourced works that we can discuss with senior wikipedians. Regarding ECP website the by-elections of NA-154 in which Jahangir Tareen of Lodhran plus other National Assembly seats up for election reduced Sharif majority. Also you have to sepereate the independents who backed Sharif and those actually in PML-N. (Wiki id2(talk) 03:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

A page you started (Hameeda Waheeduddin) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Hameeda Waheeduddin, Shahrukhwani1!

Wikipedia editor Winged Blades of Godric just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Ok!

To reply, leave a comment on Winged Blades of Godric's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Winged Blades Godric 09:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rawalpindi Ring Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rawat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Information Technology University.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Information Technology University.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — kashmiri TALK 09:28, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've removed the unreliable reference (medium.com) that you added. Dawn.com source is already in the article so I've removed that as well. We don't need primary source (na.gov.pk) --Saqib (talk) 10:43, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, unfortunately I had to revert your changes to this article because it did not appear constructive. --Saqib (talk) 14:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid adding non-independent sources to BLP's. This saifgroup.com constitutes as an unacceptable source therefore cannot be used as citation. I expect you to remove it or I will do it later tomorrow. --Saqib (talk) 17:09, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reactions to the 2016 Lahore suicide bombing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the 2016 Lahore suicide bombing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 01:55, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reactions to the 2016 Lahore suicide bombing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the 2016 Lahore suicide bombing (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 00:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Habib University[edit]

Template:Habib University has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Störm (talk) 17:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Islamabad Serena Hotel Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Islamabad Serena Hotel Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:LUMS[edit]

Template:LUMS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Störm (talk) 12:35, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]