User talk:Showalter,mike
- Showalter,mike (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- you got the wrong guy, some other guy, at worlds end, did this nasty business and now your punishing me? (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Block message:
original block message
- Blocking administrator: not provided (talk • blocks)
Decline reason: Not autoblocked. Directly blocked. — Smashvilletalk 06:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Reviewing admins, this is related to a block of Atworldsend (talk · contribs). This account is apparently caught up in an autoblock. After looking at the account's history, I find it hard to believe that they've made the exact same vandal edits to the same articles, share an IP, and are going to pretend not be know each other. I've now blocked this account directly as an obvious sock, and will leave the unblock request up for review. Kuru talk 03:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Complete and utter BUUULLLSHIT
- Showalter,mike (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- Why am i permantly blocked from wikipedia... I want answers cherry cakes. (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Block message:
- Blocking administrator: not provided.
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
|original block message|not provided|decline=Not autoblocked. Directly blocked. —
{{unblock-auto reviewed|This is fair to me how?
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Michael and Michael Have Issues, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.movieweb.com/tv/news/03/30603.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Michael and Michael Have Issues[edit]
A tag has been placed on Michael and Michael Have Issues requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Alinnisawest(talk) 02:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:41, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Mombrune.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Mombrune.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)